Archive for March, 2008

Alignment is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Alignment covers many problems arising from conflicts between the actual business and overlaid structures

We keep hearing about alignment problems. Alignment problems are caused because the business is not organized. Alignment problems arise from actual business change in results produced and capital utilized as performance solutions, which remain undefined and unorganized. Instead, the enterprise is organized, planned, directed, controlled, and reported through separate and distinct structures laid over the business. With every business change, rigid overlaid structures go out of alignment with the business. Many solutions are available supposedly to enable alignment. Many books have proposed alignment solutions. However, in spite of all of these solutions and books, alignment problems remain. The alignment solutions attempt to align organization and management structures with each other with nothing to align against. “Alignments with the business” do not actually define the business to align against.

Result-performance Management solves the alignment problem by organizing and managing the business

The various alignment problems are eliminated by organizing the business. Result-performance Management organizes and manages the business through one integrated result-performance business structure, which aligns all deployed performance solutions with the output results they produce. With R-pM, there is only one business structure and no alignment problem. Structures laid over the business are removed. One business structure is used for all organization, planning, directing, control, and reporting.

The Alignment Problem

The conventional enterprise faces many unsolvable alignment problems

We have such well-known alignment problems, such as the following, because of rigid structures laid over the business: [more...]:

Structures laid over the business produce enormous information complexity

20^th century management does not manage the actual business, but manages the enterprise using a multitude of organization, process, account, performance, system, administration, etc structures laid over the business. The structures are rigid and do not change with actual business change. No structure captures consistent, complete, and accurate business data. The various structures use different names for the same entity and different definitions for the same part of the enterprise. Information systems computerize the various structures producing enormous amounts of incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate information. This causes the exploding information complexity and information management problems enterprises are experiencing today.

Information generally is not organized and managed as capital

Information capital management is not well organized. Accounting is responsible for financial records, information technology may perform data management and record retention, there may be a function for knowledge management, record management, or business or management intelligence. Even with this, there is little management of information for application to improve the business. There is no structure to relate information directly to the business and no data is collected on the actual business as a related set.

The explosion in enterprise information problems and investments demands a basic rethink

These problems are aggravated by the proliferation of IT use for email, Internet information storage and downloads, information exchanges, imaged documents, etc. New corporate governance requirements demand a solution to these problems. [more...]s.

Corporate Governance is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Corporate Governance problems are “solved” my more imposed governance

We have all heard of the recurring crisis in cooperate governance. Governing the corporation is a big problem because we cannot manage the corporate business. We overlay a myriad of contrived structures on the business to organize and manage various entities like units, functions, activities, processes, objects, jobs, etc. Corporate governance itself may be through a contrived corporate governance structure laid over the business to extract and reconcile information from other overlaid structures.

Corporate governances problems are “solved” by adding to the problems with more stringent and costly requirements for outdated 20^th century accounting, auditing, and compliance reporting.

Corporate governance problems must be solved through governance of the actual corporate business

Corporations will be governed effectively only after corporation businesses are organized and managed. The strategic corporate business must be defined as strategic results and the new and improved performance solutions to produce the strategic results. Result goals and performance expectations must be established period by period to the strategic horizon. Corporate governance can then manage actual result value creation against goals and strategic estimates, corporate responsibility for actual business practices, and corporate information capital as part the actual business. The solution to the corporate governance problem is Result-performance Management (R-pM) to organize the corporate business for 21^st Century Management. Review the article “Seeking Good Corporate Governance by strengthening Bad Governance” at Result-performance-Management.com.

Corporate Governance Problem

We overlay structures on the corporate business, and fail to organize the business

We do not organize the business. Instead, we lay many structures over the business for organization, strategy, planning and budgeting, business processes, information systems, performance management, accounts, administration, etc. We gather data on all the entities used and compile a wide variety of management and statutory reporting, but we cannot capture actual business data. Each overlaid structure creates business and information complexity, obscures the view of the business, and compounds the problem of corporate governance. [more...].

Our personal business is the way that we organize and manage our daily life

Each of us has our own personal business that must be organized and managed just to get things done in our daily life.

We organize our personal business naturally

We have things to accomplish, whether it is a prepared breakfast, arrived at work, entries in a “to do” list, items purchased, or going out for a good time. Each thing we accomplish is a result. We do not consciously think of them as results, we just accomplish them naturally. The results we produce are distinct outputs or accomplishments that can be described and counted.

In order to produce results, we naturally utilize our capability, knowledge, reusable equipment, a process, consumable supplies, tactics, etc. The things we use in performance are our personal capital, such as our residence, our belongings, our car, our money, and our own time. We use capital as the appropriate performance solution to produce the result, such as a capability we have, a tool or equipment, a recipe, specific supply items, etc. We organize these performance solutions in our residence so that we know where solutions are, when we need to produce a result. We all organize our business results and performance solutions in the same way, because it is the natural way to organize.< [more...].

Change Management is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Business change cannot be managed directly because the business is not managed

Business change is a mystery to the 20^th century enterprise because the business, the activity of providing goods and services, is not organized and managed. The enterprise is organized and managed through organization and management structures laid over the business. 20^th century “business change” is not change to the business, but is change to structures laid over the business. Most “business change” lays new organization, process, or system structures over the business with little positive change to the business itself. Since the business is not managed, the value created by change cannot be planned or managed and the return on change investments cannot be measured.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business for direct management of business change

Business change is a change to either an output result produced by the business or a performance solution utilized by the business. When the business is organized and managed, business change automatically reorganizes the business and can be managed as the routine. R-pM organizes results and performance solutions to change the business as the daily routine. Business change projects involve result-performance development to increase the value of results or to enable new results, by implementing new or improved performance solutions. If the enterprise does not manage results and performance, it is difficult to manage change to results and performance.

The Change Management Problem

20^th century business change is change to overlaid organization and management structures

Even accepting 20^th century management change to overlaid organization, process, information system, account, performance management, and other structures, there are another set of problems. [more...]

Today’s change driver is globalization and new technologies

Businesses across the world are still coping up with the changes triggered by globalization and explosive growth of information and communication technologies.

Businesses are still exploring the ways and mean of improving operational efficiencies through systematic deployment of IT infrastructure and automating the business processes along the supply chains spanning across the businesses and in many cases across the continents.

Economic liberalization in developing countries has opened new opportunities and challenges and national companies are transforming themselves into international firms to take the advantage of growth markets and low cost sourcing hubs all over the world. In the course of doing so, the firms are putting their might in tackling with the associated issues such as growing competition and M&A mania among other things.

Tomorrow’s change driver is environment protection

As the businesses are trying to come to terms with these complex issues, early warning signals of next driver of global change are already showing up. This change driver has the potential to change the way we look at business and for that matter the world around us.

This is climate change, which is subtly but surely making its impact on the businesses all over the world. It is only a matter of time before this dreaded aspect becomes an integral part of the business and concern shifts from doing well to doing good.

There is an urgent need for businesses to realize that environment is no longer a image building exercise with corporate social responsibility. There is a far greater need for the companies to discover the impact of carbon economy on their business. Impact on operational efficiencies may be quite obvious for many but the real challenge for the companies is unearth the strategic imperative of this change driver, so as to gain sustainable competitive advantage through eco-friendly processes and products.

The businesses must respond to the change proactively, as the luxury of reacting to the change, as has been the general trend with changes in the past, is not an option in this case. Such an attitude may prove too costly, not for the business or community in which the business operates but for the whole planet. The time to think creatively and act is now. This must be on the top of leadership agenda no matter where you operate, or which industry you belong to. .

Information Technology is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Information Technology incorporates a wide variety of unsolvable problems

Information Technology (IT) employed today has many inherent problems that many expensive solutions have never been able to solve:

• Information technology is managed as technology, rather than as capital preventing integration with the business
• Information technology employs large monolithic information systems that are laid over the business, instead of information processing solutions that are utilized by the business
• Information Technology defines different architectures to define and align the business, systems, hardware and networks, and data and information, rather than integrating each with the business
• Different categories of information capital are mixed in many systems using different entity names and definitions producing information complexity and preventing proper information capital management
• Since the business is not organized, information systems manage information related to structures laid over the business and do not capture, process, or report actual business data and management information
• Information Technology is difficult to manage because it mixes business, facility, and management capital that require diverse management and operating capabilities
• It is difficult to manage return on IT investments since the investments are lumped together and do not produce direct measured business improvements
• Information Technology has grown into a large expensive empire that involves much unnecessary processing, extensive overheads, and unsolvable problems

These problems can never be solved with 20^th century management that tries to improve the enterprise by laying new or improved structures over the business.

Information Technology problems disappear when using R-pM to organize the business for 21^st Century Management

The only way to eliminate the Information Technology problems is by organizing the business with Result-performance Management (R-pM) to enable 21^st Century Management. R-pM integrates information technology in the business as capital defined as specific performance solutions utilized to produce specific business results. R-pM provides the following measures to eliminate the unsolvable Information Technology problem:

• R-pM organizes the actual business as specific performance solutions, including IT solutions, to produce specific business results
• Information system solutions are defined and integrated with the business process as modules to produce a specific result or a chain of results
• Information systems focus on managing actual business data in result value and quality, performance cost and effectiveness, capital worth, and return on capital investments that is not processed today
• Information Technology is defined and organized as capital, with other capital of the same category, for proper capital management by those with the professional capability
• Information capital is defined and managed as business data, human knowledge, facility records, and management intelligence to produce information solutions needed by the business
• Enterprise information is integrated by performance solution utilized, result produced, supplier, customer, time period, business transaction, etc in an enterprise Business Information Base for one set of complete and accurate business information
• Information systems and processing devoted to managing arbitrary structures laid over the business and special systems to address problems in data reconciliation, information integration and extraction, and management reporting are discontinued, if not directly needed by the business
• New information system implementation integrates business and information processing with other performance solutions to produce specific output results needed by the business
• The business is organized for a new generation of 21^st Century Management systems and business-information process modules, to process the actual business result by result, and provide one set of consistently-defined management information

Using R-pM to manage information technology as capital utilized by the actual business eliminates the unsolvable IT problems in business alignment, information complexity, data reconciliation, unknown costs and value, unknown capital worth and returns, CIO and IT management capabilities, data integration and control, and on and on.

The Information Technology Problem

Enterprise information systems include a wide variety of systems that are laid over the business

Since the business is not organized, different management structures must by laid over the business to manage the enterprise. [more...]

Separate organization and management structures have always been laid over the business causing complexity

Since the beginning, enterprises have implemented organization, process, account, performance, project, IT architectures, administrative functions, and other structures. Each of these many structures must be maintained and managed producing business complexity. Many conflicting entities that define each structure produce information complexity, prevent consistent and accurate management information, and require high-cost information technology overheads.

Experts have wanted to find one structure to organize and manage the enterprise as one consistent whole

Over the years, there have been many efforts to create one simple and consistently-defined structure for reliable communications, accurate management information, use of common solutions, business collaboration, and other needs. The answer, so far, is to lay higher level management structures over existing structures and the business to consolidate information and reconcile data from other structures. However, until now, no one has defined the one integrated structure that can replace all existing structures and be used to organize and manage any enterprise in any industry.

The one integrated structure has existed all along; it is the business

There is one structure. It has been there all along! That structure is the business itself! [more...]f!