Archive for the 'Administration and Capital Management' forum

20^th century management lays reporting structures over the business

Since the business is not organized or managed the actual business cannot be reported. Management reporting is against the myriad of organization, management, administrative, and other structures laid over the business. Each structure employs its own terminology and information systems to produce reports on the structure. This produces a myriad of unrelated management reports for plans, business processing, resource planning and utilization, manufacturing, supply chains, customer relationships, accounting, quality control, financial management, human resource management, information technology management and on and on. The reporting possibilities create information complexity with no specific framework to relate all the reporting. Despite all the reports and complexity, there is no direct reporting on the actual business.

We try to bring together information from the diverse structures by adding special 20^th century reporting structures, such as:

• Performance management: Control panels, dashboards, scorecards and various other structures to capture and report information
• Strategic enterprise management: Structures to consolidate defined information from specific information systems
• Data reconciliation: Structures to gather and redefine inconsistent data from diverse systems
• Decision support and drill down: Structures to allow management to search and find information in diverse systems
• Categorization: Structures laid over information to reconcile and restructure information and to manage records, documents, reports, content, and other information sub-sets

These various reporting structures and supporting information systems constitute a large overhead and contribute to rather than solving information and business complexity problems. Management information produced is inconsistent, inaccurate, and incomplete in terms of what is actually happening in the business.

Business management reporting must be against the current and planned business

In order to report the business the actual business must be organized, planned, directed, and controlled as explained in previous articles. Actual business reporting is provided by Result-performance Management (R-pM) by reporting the three components of the business:

• Results: The economic outputs of value and quality produced across the business
• Capital: The investments in capital as specific solutions that must be acquired and developed to provide the capability to produce future results and that must be utilized in business performance to produce actual results
• Performance: The deployment and utilization of a specific capital solution to incur costs and provide effectiveness in producing a specific result in a performance domain

The business can be reported only by organizing the actual business as current results produced, invested capital available to the business, and performance in the utilization of the capital to produce results. [more...].

20^th century management lays structures over the business to control the enterprise

The operations and development of the enterprise today are controlled by structures laid over the business for:

• Financial and statistical accounting through a chart of accounts structure
• Cost accounting through activity, center, and product structures
• Capital development control through project structures and asset registers
• Quality control through TQM, six sigma, and other quality structures

The control provided by each of these structures is limited to known entities and certain elements. Financial control covers capital for tangible assets and finances for cash receipts and expenditures, cost control is limited to known costs against selected elements like activity or project, non-financial control is sporadic depending on individual management, and quality focuses on performance producing selected end-product results.

Accounts record accrued and actual receipts and expenditures from point money comes in to the point money is spent. There is no control of the business cycle from the point money is spent until value is created to enable money to come in. Accounting control is enforcement of rules and principles rather than providing accurate information for business control.

Capital development lumps costs together as a project or tangible asset. The range or performance solutions developed are not controlled and may be classified as intangible assets. No method or information is provided to plan and control return on specific capital investments in performance solutions. Projects are not organized to capture development costs for implemented solutions and plan value-added to the business from solution utilization. Capital worth numbers are sporadic for some asset and liability solutions, but real capital worth in the capability to produce future business value is unknown.

Each structure is separate from other structures and uses its own terminology and definitions to describe the enterprise. Each structure introduces high costs and much effort to collect and report information. But, none of these overlaid structures can control the actual business.

The actual business must be controlled for each component of the current and planned business

In order to control the business the actual business must be organized, planned, and directed as explained in previous articles. [more...].

The typical corporation has enormous IT overheads, but still has no system to manage the business

The typical corporation spends enormous sums on Information Technology and has a large IT overhead with many complex information systems. But with all this, the corporation still does not have the one information system really needed to manage the actual business. Information systems lay additional structures over the business or manage other structures laid over the business. This produces enormous business and information complexity. Corporations invest in additional systems for data reconciliation and information management, rather than simplifying information to one consistent set that reports the actual business.

The corporation has much capital administered as Information Technology instead of being managed for corporate benefit, and has much information administered as technology instead of being managed to provide information solutions for business and management results. There are no unifying business entities to be referenced to control all information in, entering, or leaving the enterprise, including emails, Internet downloads, and file transmissions.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) manages the business as one integrated information system

Result-performance Management (R-pM) uses IT to manage the actual business as one simplified Result-performance Management System. R-pM manages other simplified application programs as performance solutions integrated with the business process, where needed, to produce a specific result.

R-pM eliminates overlaid 20^th century business information systems and the need for a large IT overhead. [more...].

Business performance utilizes capital available to the business to produce business results

Result-performance Management (R-pM) defines the business as “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs and produce value in results”. Every business in the world must produce specific economic output results in order to be successful. Every business in the world invests in capital, in order to have the capital needed to produce output results. Business performance is the actual utilization of capital to produce results.

20^th century business performance includes both actions executed and results accomplished

The 20^th century definition of performance used in business today includes both the actions executed and results accomplished. This definition causes many 20^th century management problems and prevents actual business definition and management. Business performance management, capital development, business processes, management reporting, key performance indicators, etc mix both performance and results produced together as performance. This causes problems today in actually distinguishing and separating results produced from the performance executed.

R-pM separates results from performance to manage the performance producing a result

Actual business performance does not include things accomplished or business results. R-pM separates out results as results produced by business performance and restricts business performance to the activity of the business and actions executed by the business. [more...].

What is the business and capital as part of the business?

The business is defined as “the utilization of capital in performance to produce value in results”. Every business in the world invests in capital needed, in order to utilize capital in performance, in order to produce output results. The capital must have a worth that justifies the investment costs for acquisition or development and implementation as performance solutions.

Capital is the investments in the business to have the capability to produce results

The only reason to invest in capital is to provide the capability to produce results. Capital is all the tangible and intangible assets available to be utilized by the business. Capital includes the business organization, processes and systems, humans and their capabilities, facility equipment and supplies, management plans and tactics, and information capital. Capital has a worth in the capability to create result value-added attributable to the capital over the capital life.

20^th century management fails to organize and manage capital as part of the business

Today, people think of capital as items in an asset register or on the payroll, rather than as items to be managed and utilized as part of the business. Businesses invest in enormous sums of money capital and then fail to identify the specific capital items developed, the costs of developing the capital, the worth of the capital as developed, the utilization of the capital to create value, the cost of capital utilization or consumption as capital worth deteriorates, and the value created to return the original investment. [more...].

20^th century management used today cannot manage business risk as part of the business because the business is not organized or managed. 20^th century risk management is separate from the business and concentrates on areas of proven risk, but does not cover the normal risk that is present and should be managed in everything the enterprise does.

Risk is inherent in every business and must be managed as part of the business. But, risk can be managed as part of the business only by using Result-performance Management (R-pM) to organize and manage the actual business.

Risk tends to be managed by a risk management process

Most enterprises say they manage risk. Many have risk management functions or processes to prove it. Risk is managed by risk management structures laid over the business.

There are specialists and companies devoted to risk management. Many books have been written on risk management. But, do they point us in the right direction or tell us what we really should be doing to manage day-to-day risks we face in our businesses?

Risk is an inherent part of the business

We all face the risk that things we want done or to happen will not be done or happen as wanted. [more...]

The typical corporation has enormous IT overheads, but still has no system to manage the business

The typical corporation spends enormous sums on Information Technology and has a large IT overhead with many complex information systems. But with all this, the corporation still does not have the one information system really needed to manage the actual business. Information systems lay additional structures over the business or manage other structures laid over the business. This produces enormous business and information complexity. Corporations invest in additional systems for data reconciliation and information management, rather than simplifying information to one consistent set that reports the actual business.

The corporation has much capital administered as Information Technology instead of being managed for corporate benefit, and has much information administered as technology instead of being managed to provide information solutions for business and management results. There are no unifying business entities to be referenced to control all information in, entering, or leaving the enterprise, including emails, Internet downloads, and file transmissions.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) manages the business as one integrated information system

Result-performance Management (R-pM) uses IT to manage the actual business as one simplified Result-performance Management System. R-pM manages other simplified application programs as performance solutions integrated with the business process, where needed, to produce a specific result.

R-pM eliminates overlaid 20^th century business information systems and the need for a large IT overhead. Information technology capital, support, and capabilities are no longer managed separately as “Information Technology”, but are integrated as part of normal capital management. R-pM references all information to the actual business and integrates all information as capital in one Business Information Base to produce data, knowledge, record, and intelligence solutions needed to produce specific business results.

R-pM enables simplified information systems, integrated capital management, and integrated information capital solutions

Result-performance Management eliminates the Corporate IT Empire and the complex information systems laid over the business by organizing and managing the actual business with one simplified system, by simplifying applications to produce specific results, and by properly managing information technology and capital as capital.

IT capital is organized with similar business, facility, and management capital to be managed by professionals. IT systems needed by the business are integrated with the business process to produce specific results. One set of complete, consistent, and accurate management information is reported against the actual current and strategic business, including measured performance costs, result value and value-added, capital worth, and return on capital investments that cannot be measured today.

IT systems and overheads not needed for the business are eliminated. New IT investments are restricted to Result-performance Management Systems to manage actual business results. IT expenditures and investments are reduced dramatically to only those needed to support and manage the actual business.

Learn more in the article “IT Empires and Systems that do not manage the actual Business“, which explains the problems with 20^th century information systems and the administration of high-worth enterprise capital as “information technology”. .

20^th century management problems are caused by structures laid over the enterprise business

The generally accepted “enterprise business” definition is the activity of providing goods and services. The failure of 20^th century management to organize and manage the activity of providing goods and services creates unsolvable management, business, and performance problems.

The fatal error of 20^th century management is laying a rigid and arbitrary enterprise organization structure over on the business, rather than organizing the business. Since the business is not organized the business cannot be managed, therefore, rigid enterprise management structures for planning, processes, systems, accounts, quality, administration, performance, reporting, etc must be contrived and laid over the business. Structures laid over the business conflict with the actual business, restrict business flexibility, move out of “alignment” as the business changes, and prevent direct business data capture and management.

20^th century management improvements can never solve unsolvable problems

We continue to teach 20^th century management, contrive new 20^th century structures and “business solutions” to lay over the business, and write more 20^th century management books, but we can never solve the top ten problems of 20^th century management. [more...].

20^th century management administers the human resource function

Today’s 20^th century management generally administers human resources as employees. Human capital management is talked about, but is not truly understood and is rarely put into practice. Since the business is not managed, human capital can not be managed as a part of the business. Humans tend to be assigned to a responsibility center to be managed by a specific manager, with human utilization and development depending on the outlook of the manager.

Human and knowledge development tend to be directed at the general needs of the enterprise, rather than the specific needs of the business. Humans are not developed and utilized as enterprise capital to create the highest value and to increase human capital worth.

R-pM manages human capital worth to produce result value-added for 21^st Century Management

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business for 21^st Century Management. R-pM follows 21st Century Management conventions, definitions, and standards to enable business collaboration and integration, common solutions and outsourcing, and an environment for human capital development that can be applied to any business. R-pM includes fundamental principles to improve the worth of human capital and the value-added to business results:

• Enterprise capital is organized by the human capabilities required to manage, develop, and support the capital
• Enterprise result sets are organized to utilize a common set of performance solutions, particularly human capability and outlook
• Human capital is organized as one category to be managed by those with human management and development capabilities
• Human personnel is readiness capital to maintain human capital ready to produce a set of results under a result management responsibility
• Human capability is production capital to define the capabilities needed by the business process for difficult high-value results to acquire or develop specific capabilities needed by the business
• Human knowledge is information capital to create and manage the knowledge to develop capabilities, and to utilize specific performance solutions to produce specific results
• Human capital worth is increased by additional capabilities developed and knowledge established through knowledge creation to produce results
• Human capital worth is assessed against the known result value-added produced and other factors to ensure that human remuneration is in line with the value created in the business

Human capital is the most difficult to acquire, develop, and manage in any business. R-pM places human capital where they have the interest, outlook, and capability to produce specific results and develops capabilities where humans have the interest, innate foundation, and prior experience.< [more...].

Structures laid over the business produce enormous information complexity

20^th century management does not manage the actual business, but manages the enterprise using a multitude of organization, process, account, performance, system, administration, etc structures laid over the business. The structures are rigid and do not change with actual business change. No structure captures consistent, complete, and accurate business data. The various structures use different names for the same entity and different definitions for the same part of the enterprise. Information systems computerize the various structures producing enormous amounts of incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate information. This causes the exploding information complexity and information management problems enterprises are experiencing today.

Information generally is not organized and managed as capital

Information capital management is not well organized. Accounting is responsible for financial records, information technology may perform data management and record retention, there may be a function for knowledge management, record management, or business or management intelligence. Even with this, there is little management of information for application to improve the business. There is no structure to relate information directly to the business and no data is collected on the actual business as a related set.

The explosion in enterprise information problems and investments demands a basic rethink

These problems are aggravated by the proliferation of IT use for email, Internet information storage and downloads, information exchanges, imaged documents, etc. New corporate governance requirements demand a solution to these problems. [more...]s.