Archive for the 'Corporate Investment and Governance' forum

Managers may prevent beneficial business change that is against their vested interest

We all know stories about managers who resist change to protect their own power and authority. How do we prevent damage from vested interests in the enterprise? Is it just up to the Board and CEO to know what is going on? How does the Board or CEO find out? Whom does the CEO listen to? Is there a way to support those with change ideas that are widely considered as good and to counteract those widely considered as bad? Whose head is on the line if profits suffer because beneficial change is delayed? Is it the lower-level manager responsible or the CEO?

Good corporate management and governance requires more than one reporting line

20^th century management methods provide only one reporting line. Responsibility for performance includes responsibility for capital invested, responsibility for utilization of capital as solutions, and responsibility for output results produced. [more...].

20^th century management lays structures over the business to control the enterprise

The operations and development of the enterprise today are controlled by structures laid over the business for:

• Financial and statistical accounting through a chart of accounts structure
• Cost accounting through activity, center, and product structures
• Capital development control through project structures and asset registers
• Quality control through TQM, six sigma, and other quality structures

The control provided by each of these structures is limited to known entities and certain elements. Financial control covers capital for tangible assets and finances for cash receipts and expenditures, cost control is limited to known costs against selected elements like activity or project, non-financial control is sporadic depending on individual management, and quality focuses on performance producing selected end-product results.

Accounts record accrued and actual receipts and expenditures from point money comes in to the point money is spent. There is no control of the business cycle from the point money is spent until value is created to enable money to come in. Accounting control is enforcement of rules and principles rather than providing accurate information for business control.

Capital development lumps costs together as a project or tangible asset. The range or performance solutions developed are not controlled and may be classified as intangible assets. No method or information is provided to plan and control return on specific capital investments in performance solutions. Projects are not organized to capture development costs for implemented solutions and plan value-added to the business from solution utilization. Capital worth numbers are sporadic for some asset and liability solutions, but real capital worth in the capability to produce future business value is unknown.

Each structure is separate from other structures and uses its own terminology and definitions to describe the enterprise. Each structure introduces high costs and much effort to collect and report information. But, none of these overlaid structures can control the actual business.

The actual business must be controlled for each component of the current and planned business

In order to control the business the actual business must be organized, planned, and directed as explained in previous articles. [more...].

20^th century management lays structures over the business to direct the enterprise

The day to day operations of the enterprise today are directed through a variety of structures laid over the business. These structures focus on enterprise performance, which mixes the actions of performance together with the results accomplished. The main structures used to direct the enterprise are:

• Processes, which define the flow of performance across the enterprise
• Functions, which define activities performed by the enterprise
• Information systems, which provide the flow of information processing
• Work assignments and tasks, to perform ad-hoc activities
• Projects, to perform one-time enterprise endeavors

These structures are used to manage performance of the enterprise and to produce results as separate entities, such as products, services, sales, and revenue.

None of the overlaid structures directs the actual business

The actual business consists of results produced, capital available in performance solutions, and performance to utilize solutions to produce each result. None of the overlaid structures direct the utilization of performance solutions to produce results. Most enterprise direction is up to the experience and capability of the manager to make decisions and take actions without a business framework.

Structures used to direct the enterprise do not relate to other management structures

The structures used to direct the enterprise do not relate directly to the structures used to organize, plan, control, and report the enterprise. A prior article showed that certain structures are used to plan the enterprise in strategic maps and corporate plans, financial plans and budgets, information technology plans and architectures, investment and capital development plans, and operational plans. The structures used to direct the enterprise are not connected to or do not necessarily refer to the structures that plan the enterprise. Enterprise direction and management is disconnected among a wide variety of structures that can be contrived and laid over any business.

The business must be organized and planned to provide the basis for business direction

Before the business can be directed, the business is organized using Result-performance Management (R-pM) in the current business structure, and the business is planned in the strategic business structure with result goals and performance expectations by time periods from the current business. [more...].

The organization structure is the fatal error of 20^th century management

Every day new enterprises are started-up around the world. New enterprises have the one-time opportunity to organize and manage the enterprise business from scratch. These new enterprises unthinkingly adopt obsolete 20^th century management and doom themselves to the burden the unsolvable 20^th century problems discussed here at the Business Change Forum. They waste the precious “green field” advantage of no legacy structures and the opportunity to do it right from the start.

Conventional wisdom says copy an existing business model or organization theory and do not “reinvent the wheel”. This “wisdom” replicates other enterprises’ problems.

Many new start-up enterprises retain management consultants to conduct an organization study. Management consultants still recommend that new enterprises lay obsolete 20^th century management structures over the business, rather than organizing and managing the business for significant competitive advantage.

Do not lay an organization structure over your business!

Once a new enterprise lays a rigid organization structure over the business, the business can never be managed. The enterprise must lay additional management structures over the business. The many inflexible structures conflict with the business causing unsolvable 20^th century problems with business change, unknown costs and value creation, unknown capital worth and investment returns, excessive IT and other capital overheads, mismanaged capital development, business and information complexity, unsupported corporate governance, alignment, collaboration, and so on.

New enterprises must not waste that precious “green field” advantage

New start-up companies have the opportunity to do it right from the start by using R-pM to organize the business for 21^st Century Management. [more...].

20^th century management used today lays various plans over the business

20^th century management cannot plan the business directly because the business is not organized. The enterprise is planned through various structures laid over the business. These overlaid planning structures include:

• Strategic plans using such structures as maps and corporate plans
• Financial plan and budget structures
• Information technology plans and enterprise architectures
• Capital development plans and investment analysis structures
• Operational plan structures

Each of these planning structures uses its own set of entities to describe the enterprise, uses different information systems, and requires its own support staff. Each plan must be maintained and updated with actual progress against the planned entities, and reported. The plans plan the enterprise in various ways depending on the particular structures implemented. It is difficult to understand and manage the actual business from these plans.

None of the overlaid plans plan the actual business

Since the business is not organized, the business cannot be planned. The results produced by the business cannot be planned as an interrelated set. Some results may be planned in isolation as separate entities such as product sold and revenue received. The plans are usually created from estimates rather than a period by period build up from the existing business. [more...].

20^th century management used today does not organize the business

20^th century management lays a contrived enterprise organization structure over the business, instead of organizing the business. This is the fatal error of 20^th century management. If the business is not organized, the business cannot be managed.

The contrived organization structure follows one of many 20^th century organization theories to organize the enterprise. The business, which we have defined as “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs and produce value in results” is not organized. The rigid organization structure goes out of “alignment” with every new or closed result or change to a performance solution utilized. Eventually there is need for reorganization to contrive a new organization structure that is closer aligned to the actual business, and the cycle is repeated.

The need for reorganization shows that the business is not organized

Some may argue that their business is organized. Ask if they ever reorganize the business, and they will answer yes, of course. Reorganization is needed because the business is not organized. [more...].

20^th century management plans the future enterprise and does not plan the business

20^th century management used today develops strategies and plans using maps, corporate plans, budgets, etc that are laid over the business. Corporate plans plan the corporation and are unable plan the strategic value to be created by the business and the capital development needed to create strategic value. The business is not planned and strategies and plans become invalid as the business changes. New plans try to bring the enterprise plans in closer alignment with the current and future business.

The business is “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs to produce value in results”

Result-performance Management (R-pM) is based on the definition of the enterprise business as “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs to produce value in results”. This definition includes the current business that must be conducted every day to utilize capital the enterprise invests in to produce results needed for business success. The definition also includes the future business that must be the objective or the business strategy to produce strategic results utilizing capital that must be available when needed?

The management strategy plans the business at the strategic horizon

The strategic business is “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs to produce value in results at the strategic horizon”. The strategic business is described as management strategy capital. The business strategy, strategic business structure, and business plans to execute the strategy are management strategy solutions.< [more...].

R-pM is a breakthrough to manage the actual business and leave 20^th century management problems behind

R-pM organizes and manages the actual business, “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs and produce value in results”, without 20^th century management problems with reorganization, business change, business and information complexity, complex and costly IT infrastructures, unknown costs and value, unknown capital worth and returns, excessive overheads and costs from overlaid structures, and on and on.

R-pM is a new natural business perspective requiring little investment or risk

R-pM minimizes capital to that required by the business, optimizes business performance to reduce performance costs and increase result value, and manages result value-quality chains to produce customer input results. R-pM provides enormous competitive advantage, while the investment and risk is minimal. R-pM is mainly a change in thinking, which requires time to take hold. Human capital learns to operate and manage the actual business, instead of structures laid over the business. Existing information systems likely can be utilized as business process solutions, if the business is properly defined and organized.

The existing business is gradually redefined into result value-quality chains and one integrated business structure. Obsolete structures laid over the business and unsolvable 20^th century management problems are gradually abolished. As the enterprise learns R-pM, implementation accelerates and the competitive advantage of R-pM increases until the complete business is organized for 21^st Century Management.

Owners, investors, shareholders, lenders and others with a financial interest must lead the way to manage the actual business

Business owners, shareholders, potential investors, lenders, etc have the most to gain by being among the first to use R-pM. [more...].

20^th century management used today cannot manage business risk as part of the business because the business is not organized or managed. 20^th century risk management is separate from the business and concentrates on areas of proven risk, but does not cover the normal risk that is present and should be managed in everything the enterprise does.

Risk is inherent in every business and must be managed as part of the business. But, risk can be managed as part of the business only by using Result-performance Management (R-pM) to organize and manage the actual business.

Risk tends to be managed by a risk management process

Most enterprises say they manage risk. Many have risk management functions or processes to prove it. Risk is managed by risk management structures laid over the business.

There are specialists and companies devoted to risk management. Many books have been written on risk management. But, do they point us in the right direction or tell us what we really should be doing to manage day-to-day risks we face in our businesses?

Risk is an inherent part of the business

We all face the risk that things we want done or to happen will not be done or happen as wanted. [more...]

All capital development should develop capital, plus business results for return on investment

Every business enterprise must produce output results that lead to goods and service results to create value. An expanding enterprise must produce new results of increasing value. The enterprise needs additional capital in order to produce new results as part of the business. The capital must be acquired or developed, implemented as specific performance solutions, and then utilized to produce improved or new results of increased value. The value added to new business results must justify the capital expenditure to acquire or develop needed solutions and provide the return on investment.

All capital development is really result and capital development to develop capital as performance solutions to be utilized to create additional value in output results produced by the business. The additional value of output results provides the return on the capital development investment. If the performance solutions utilized and the results produced by the business are not managed, result and capital development cannot be managed properly and the return on investment cannot be measured. Even physical capital development, like a new building, produces performance solutions to produce results, be it the enterprise office facility solution or a facility solution to produce lease or rental income results.

20^th century management does not organize or manage results or performance

20^th century management does not manage the enterprise business, defined as “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs and produce value in results”. The business has three components: 1. capital available as performance solutions, 2. results required, and 3. performance in the utilization of a specific solution to incur costs and produce value in a specific result.

20^th century management does not define specific results produced and performance solutions utilized to be managed as sets. Added result value cannot be managed to provide benefits and specific performance solutions developed cannot be managed to know costs. Capital development is a difficult exercise separate from the business context to develop performance or tangible assets to produce some estimated return on investment. Much capital development and performance solution implementations fail to create the added result value needed for the return on investment.

R-pM manages result and capital development as part of the business for measured and managed return

The answer for all future result-capital development is Result-performance Management (R-pM) to organize the business for 21^st Century Management. R-pM manages performance solutions utilized and the business results produced to plan and manage the value added to results. R-pM provides 21^st century Result-performance Development to manage new performance solution development to produce new or improved results. R-pM manages each result-capital development project as part of the business with its own project business structure. R-pM manages implemented solution development and operating costs and the additional value-added to results to measure the actual return on investments. R-pM is the essential approach for any new result-capital development. It is all described in The R-pM Toolkit, your 21^st Century Management Manual

Result-capital development arises from the business requirements to improve results or produce new results

Result-performance Development is initiated by result symptoms in missing or deficient results. [more...].