Archive for the 'Breakthrough Innovation Management' topic

The academic approach dictates incremental improvement and prevent breakthrough thinking and innovations

Business management methods are devised using the “academic approach” that accepts the solutions in place and the existing body of knowledge as the basis and seeks to make improvements. The academic approach may produce incremental improvements, but it also prevents new management thinking and breakthroughs. New business management methods build on old methods. New business management books and articles must be substantiated as accurate by footnoting previously published works and referencing existing methods in use.

There are many fundamental problems with traditional organization and management methods that cannot be changed by traditional change methods

What if the body of knowledge in the “published record” is inaccurate or if basic management methods in use are flawed? The academic approach then propagates inaccuracies and flaws. The Business Change Forum contains hundreds of examples where today’s 20^th century organization and management methods, principles, structures and definitions are flawed and inaccurate. So, new methods build on flawed old methods. New books repeat old inaccuracies.

The Business Change Forum discusses unsolvable 20^th century management problems that have never been solved despite thousands and books and methods based on the academic approach to management improvement. [more...]>

Your business consists of capital investments, performance utilizing capital, and results produced

Your business is defined properly as “investments in capital as solutions of worth utilized for costs and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results”. Your business consists of three components that must be organized in one business structure for effective business management:

1. Results: Economic outputs of volume, value, and quality essential for business success
2. Capital: Investments in solutions of worth to be utilized by the business
3. Performance: Utilization of solutions for costs and effectiveness to produce specific results

The business structure for any part of your business looks like a spreadsheet with results required organized in columns across the top and capital utilized organized as solutions down the rows. A cell is a performance domain where a solution is deployed with cost and effectiveness exceptions to produce a result. Solution rows utilized down one result column total the cost, value-added, and quality for the result volume. Result columns that utilize a solution across one row total the cost and effectiveness of solution performance.

The enterprise organization structure is the fatal error of 20^th century management

Instead of organizing your business structure, a fixed enterprise organization structure is laid over your business, so your business cannot be managed. Management structures like corporate plans, processes, budgets, functions, accounts, cost activities, systems, etc define the enterprise differently causing business and information complexity. Rectifying structures for data reconciliation, scorecards, IT architectures, etc just compound business organization and management problems and increase IT overheads.

20^th century management structures prevent business management

You make significant investments in capital, but cannot plan return on investment, manage development of specific solutions needed by the business, determine worth of solutions to the business, measure solution return, or capture costs incurred in utilizing the solution. You must produce results from supplier input results, along a value-quality chain to produce final results that satisfy a customer willing to pay. [more...].

Managers may prevent beneficial business change that is against their vested interest

We all know stories about managers who resist change to protect their own power and authority. How do we prevent damage from vested interests in the enterprise? Is it just up to the Board and CEO to know what is going on? How does the Board or CEO find out? Whom does the CEO listen to? Is there a way to support those with change ideas that are widely considered as good and to counteract those widely considered as bad? Whose head is on the line if profits suffer because beneficial change is delayed? Is it the lower-level manager responsible or the CEO?

Good corporate management and governance requires more than one reporting line

20^th century management methods provide only one reporting line. Responsibility for performance includes responsibility for capital invested, responsibility for utilization of capital as solutions, and responsibility for output results produced. [more...].

20^th century management used today lays various plans over the business

20^th century management cannot plan the business directly because the business is not organized. The enterprise is planned through various structures laid over the business. These overlaid planning structures include:

• Strategic plans using such structures as maps and corporate plans
• Financial plan and budget structures
• Information technology plans and enterprise architectures
• Capital development plans and investment analysis structures
• Operational plan structures

Each of these planning structures uses its own set of entities to describe the enterprise, uses different information systems, and requires its own support staff. Each plan must be maintained and updated with actual progress against the planned entities, and reported. The plans plan the enterprise in various ways depending on the particular structures implemented. It is difficult to understand and manage the actual business from these plans.

None of the overlaid plans plan the actual business

Since the business is not organized, the business cannot be planned. The results produced by the business cannot be planned as an interrelated set. Some results may be planned in isolation as separate entities such as product sold and revenue received. The plans are usually created from estimates rather than a period by period build up from the existing business. [more...].

The typical corporation has enormous IT overheads, but still has no system to manage the business

The typical corporation spends enormous sums on Information Technology and has a large IT overhead with many complex information systems. But with all this, the corporation still does not have the one information system really needed to manage the actual business. Information systems lay additional structures over the business or manage other structures laid over the business. This produces enormous business and information complexity. Corporations invest in additional systems for data reconciliation and information management, rather than simplifying information to one consistent set that reports the actual business.

The corporation has much capital administered as Information Technology instead of being managed for corporate benefit, and has much information administered as technology instead of being managed to provide information solutions for business and management results. There are no unifying business entities to be referenced to control all information in, entering, or leaving the enterprise, including emails, Internet downloads, and file transmissions.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) manages the business as one integrated information system

Result-performance Management (R-pM) uses IT to manage the actual business as one simplified Result-performance Management System. R-pM manages other simplified application programs as performance solutions integrated with the business process, where needed, to produce a specific result.

R-pM eliminates overlaid 20^th century business information systems and the need for a large IT overhead. [more...].

Today’s playing field is level because all enterprises have the same problems

20^th century management continues today, because all enterprises are burdened with the same costs and problems. 20^th century management organizes and manages the enterprise through contrived structures laid over the business. The contrived organization, process, system, account, administration, IT architectures, maps, scorecards, and other rigid structures conflict with the business causing unsolvable problems.

20^th century management is a dead-end that can never solve today’s management problems

20^th century management is a dead-end that causes many unsolvable problems like reorganization, business change management, unknown costs and value, unknown capital worth and returns, intangible assets, sporadic effectiveness and quality management, business and information complexity, rampant IT investments and costs, inaccurate and conflicting enterprise information, little actual business management information, business collaboration obstacles, and on and on. The only solution 20^th century management can offer is to lay new or improved structures over the business. This is a dead-end, since the problems are unsolvable because they can never be solved by more structures laid over the business. The unsolvable problems can only get worse as enterprises grow and IT utilization increases.

R-pM offers the only solution; organize the actual business for 21^st Century Management

But now there is an alternative to traditional 20^th century management Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the only possible solution by organizing the actual business for 21^st Century Management to leave 20^th century management structures and problems behind. R-pM provides significant cost reductions and value and quality increases that go to profits, minimizes development investments and manages the planned return, and enables collaboration and low cost solutions across businesses. Using R-pM to manage the enterprise business, provides significant advantages over managing the enterprise with 20^th century management. [more...]a>.

The enterprise business is “the activity of producing goods and services”

The common definition of a business enterprise is “the activity of producing goods and services”. If the enterprise is to organize and manage the business, it must organize “the activity of producing goods and services”. Business activity is business performance and goods and services are business results. Performance is the utilization of enterprise capital to produce results. Therefore, to organize the business the enterprise must organize capital, performance, and results.

The enterprise must abolish all the outdated organization, strategy, process, account, performance management, information architectures, and other structures now laid over the business that create enormous overheads and prevent the business from being organized and managed.

R-pM organizes the business to simplify 21^st Century Management

Result-performance Management (R-pM) goes back to the basics to organize the business to utilize capital in performance to produce value in results. R-pM structures the results to be produced to create value and the capital in performance solutions available for deployment in as a business structure. The business is organized when specific performance solutions are deployed to produce specific results. The responsible organization unit is deployed as a business organization solution and the responsible manager is deployed as a human personnel solution to produce the specific result.< [more...].

20^th century management cannot capture and report essential business management information

20^th century management lays separate structures over the business for management organization, planning, direction, control, and reporting, such as:

• Organization charts, reporting relationships, and job descriptions for organization
• Strategy, corporate plan, investment, and budget structures for planning
• Work flow, function, project, process, and system structures for direction
• Financial and statistical accounting, activity and project costing, and quality structures for control
• Financial statements, performance management, and strategic enterprise management structures for reporting

Each structure defines inconsistent and conflicting entities like business unit, department, center, function, activity, project, responsibility, etc. The overlaid structures can produce enormous amounts of information producing business and information complexity. But 20^th century management cannot capture and report essential business management information.

20^th century management does not define the entities that contain cost, value, worth, and return

In order to capture data and report information about an entity, the entity must be defined and recorded. 20^th century management attempts to report cost, value, worth, and return without defining the entities that contain cost, value, worth, and return.

Costs are attributed to some known tangible assets and collected against contrived entities like activity, project, and accounts that were not produced by the costs. Numbers for value are produced by certain contrived methods and formulas to lay value chains over the business, without defining and managing the entity that contains value. Worth is defined by arbitrary depreciation formulas for fixed assets, but ignored for human and other capital. Much high-worth capital is labeled as “intangible assets” and not accounted for or managed. Capital development does not identify the precise capital items that are being acquired and developed or the planned utilization of the capital in the business to provide return on investments. [more...].

When business started, the actual business was managed

The common definition of a business enterprise is “the activity of providing goods and services”. In other words, the business is “the utilization of capital in performance to produce value in results”. We all manage our actual personal business to utilize our capital in performance to produce value in results naturally, using common sense.

Several hundred years ago, all business was in individual or small enterprises that managed actual business activity in the utilization of capital available in humans with capabilities and knowledge of the business, business practices followed, management methods and intelligence on customers, and facilities in business locations, equipment, tools, money, and supplies available. They used this capital to produce output results in goods they had to buy, goods produced or improved and relocated, final results in goods and services they had to sell, and money received from sales.

They managed their business naturally by managing utilization of capital in performance to produce value in results. Common sense told them that costs were in the consumption of capital in business activity or performance, and that value created was in results leading to the final goods and services results sold. They realized that customer willingness to pay placed value on the total of raw material results and results in their chain. They realized that profit results came from result value-added that exceeded performance costs. They realized that they had to invest in capital as specific performance solutions to be able to produce results, and that result value had to increase to repay the investment. They realized that performance in capabilities and tools had to be effective to produce a high-quality result. They realized that capacity in time, capabilities, and facilities limited the volume of results produced. They realized that performance uncertainty in producing results as needed posed risk that final results would not be produced as planned. To reduce risk, they managed the performance utilized to produce each result one by one in the chain of results needed to produce final results for their customers.

When businesses grew, enterprises were organized and managed rather than the business

In recent centuries, as businesses grew, the complete sets of capital employed and results produced became difficult to manage. There were no information systems to help manage the actual business. So, enterprises in companies, associations, and institutions were formed. New structures were contrived to manage the business enterprise, rather than the enterprise business. [more...].

Accounting, today, does not maintain accurate business records

20^th century management does not organize or manage the business. This makes it impossible to keep records on output results of value produced by the business and the consumption of capital in costs to produce each result. Instead of recording the actual business, a chart of accounts is laid over the business to record income and expenses and the worth of certain known assets. 20^th century accounting records the cash generated and spent by the business, rather than recording the complete development and utilization of capital and the complete economic output results produced by the business.

Accounting, today, contains many unsolvable 20^th century problems

Accounting is one of the main unsolvable problems of 20^th century management. Accounting is separate from the actual business, keeps only a sub-set of needed financial and non-financial business records, keeps records against a contrived chart of accounts and not the actual business, sees it role as control rather than capital management and business support, allows financial management problems such as intangible assets and unknown costs to persist, does not provide complete and accurate business information needed for corporate management and governance, and on and on.

R-pM accurately records and accounts for the actual business for 21^st Century Management

21^st century management uses Result-performance Management (R-pM) to organize the actual business as one integrated business structure. The business structure replaces all organization, accounting, planning, performance, costing, reporting, and administration structures laid over the business. R-pM employs professional records management to manage facility records as capital, to maintain complete and accurate financial and non-financial records on the actual business, and to provide information performance solutions from records for good corporate management and governance. Records management is integrated within the business to be utilized to make decisions at all levels and to record accurately actual business decisions made.

The business is the only valid account structure

The business structure organizes the economic output results of value produced to give revenues and income, the capital in performance solutions utilized to incur costs, and the positive worth of capital as assets and the negative worth as liabilities; to provide the only valid account structure. The business structure is professionally maintained as a business organization solution to represent the actual business accurately. Accounts are maintained by professional facility records management to maintain full financial, statistical, and qualitative records on the complete business. The actual business provides the chart of accounts and records are updated from actual business data on result value produced, performance costs incurred, result value-added, and capital worth. Complete and accurate records are maintained on the full business cycle and the full business scope across the enterprise.

This is explained further in the article “Your Business is your only valid Account Structure” in 21^st Century Management Magazine. The guidance needed to organize, manage, and account for your actual business is provided in the R-pM Toolkit, your 21^st Century Management Manual, which can be downloaded from Result-performance-Management.com. .