Archive for the 'Business Management Information' topic

20^th century management lays reporting structures over the business

Since the business is not organized or managed the actual business cannot be reported. Management reporting is against the myriad of organization, management, administrative, and other structures laid over the business. Each structure employs its own terminology and information systems to produce reports on the structure. This produces a myriad of unrelated management reports for plans, business processing, resource planning and utilization, manufacturing, supply chains, customer relationships, accounting, quality control, financial management, human resource management, information technology management and on and on. The reporting possibilities create information complexity with no specific framework to relate all the reporting. Despite all the reports and complexity, there is no direct reporting on the actual business.

We try to bring together information from the diverse structures by adding special 20^th century reporting structures, such as:

• Performance management: Control panels, dashboards, scorecards and various other structures to capture and report information
• Strategic enterprise management: Structures to consolidate defined information from specific information systems
• Data reconciliation: Structures to gather and redefine inconsistent data from diverse systems
• Decision support and drill down: Structures to allow management to search and find information in diverse systems
• Categorization: Structures laid over information to reconcile and restructure information and to manage records, documents, reports, content, and other information sub-sets

These various reporting structures and supporting information systems constitute a large overhead and contribute to rather than solving information and business complexity problems. Management information produced is inconsistent, inaccurate, and incomplete in terms of what is actually happening in the business.

Business management reporting must be against the current and planned business

In order to report the business the actual business must be organized, planned, directed, and controlled as explained in previous articles. Actual business reporting is provided by Result-performance Management (R-pM) by reporting the three components of the business:

• Results: The economic outputs of value and quality produced across the business
• Capital: The investments in capital as specific solutions that must be acquired and developed to provide the capability to produce future results and that must be utilized in business performance to produce actual results
• Performance: The deployment and utilization of a specific capital solution to incur costs and provide effectiveness in producing a specific result in a performance domain

The business can be reported only by organizing the actual business as current results produced, invested capital available to the business, and performance in the utilization of the capital to produce results. [more...].

The typical corporation has enormous IT overheads, but still has no system to manage the business

The typical corporation spends enormous sums on Information Technology and has a large IT overhead with many complex information systems. But with all this, the corporation still does not have the one information system really needed to manage the actual business. Information systems lay additional structures over the business or manage other structures laid over the business. This produces enormous business and information complexity. Corporations invest in additional systems for data reconciliation and information management, rather than simplifying information to one consistent set that reports the actual business.

The corporation has much capital administered as Information Technology instead of being managed for corporate benefit, and has much information administered as technology instead of being managed to provide information solutions for business and management results. There are no unifying business entities to be referenced to control all information in, entering, or leaving the enterprise, including emails, Internet downloads, and file transmissions.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) manages the business as one integrated information system

Result-performance Management (R-pM) uses IT to manage the actual business as one simplified Result-performance Management System. R-pM manages other simplified application programs as performance solutions integrated with the business process, where needed, to produce a specific result.

R-pM eliminates overlaid 20^th century business information systems and the need for a large IT overhead. [more...].

Methods like Total Quality Management and ISO 9000 Standards did not provide the quality management needed

We have had structures like Total Quality Management (TQM) and the ISO quality system for ISO 9000 standards and certification, which were found lacking as a management method. We also reengineered our business process with BPR, specifically to help us manage performance quality. But, performance quality proved difficult to comprehend and manage. Six Sigma provides another structure for our final production quality. Now we have business process and performance management (BPM) to manage the quality of our processes and performance. Even with all this, we still have not found a way to manage quality as the business routine of everyone in the enterprise.

R-pM manages customer determined quality result by result

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business by organizing results produced across the business as one-off results or as result chains and by organizing the capital utilized as performance solutions to produce each result. With an organized business, the company can manage quality as an attribute of results, not performance, and can manage real quality for any result, not just final results from production. Every result has a customer who is willing to pay a result value for a determined level of quality. Quality and value of each result must be acceptable to the customer. [more...].

The enterprise business is “the activity of producing goods and services”

The common definition of a business enterprise is “the activity of producing goods and services”. If the enterprise is to organize and manage the business, it must organize “the activity of producing goods and services”. Business activity is business performance and goods and services are business results. Performance is the utilization of enterprise capital to produce results. Therefore, to organize the business the enterprise must organize capital, performance, and results.

The enterprise must abolish all the outdated organization, strategy, process, account, performance management, information architectures, and other structures now laid over the business that create enormous overheads and prevent the business from being organized and managed.

R-pM organizes the business to simplify 21^st Century Management

Result-performance Management (R-pM) goes back to the basics to organize the business to utilize capital in performance to produce value in results. R-pM structures the results to be produced to create value and the capital in performance solutions available for deployment in as a business structure. The business is organized when specific performance solutions are deployed to produce specific results. The responsible organization unit is deployed as a business organization solution and the responsible manager is deployed as a human personnel solution to produce the specific result.< [more...].

The typical corporation has enormous IT overheads, but still has no system to manage the business

The typical corporation spends enormous sums on Information Technology and has a large IT overhead with many complex information systems. But with all this, the corporation still does not have the one information system really needed to manage the actual business. Information systems lay additional structures over the business or manage other structures laid over the business. This produces enormous business and information complexity. Corporations invest in additional systems for data reconciliation and information management, rather than simplifying information to one consistent set that reports the actual business.

The corporation has much capital administered as Information Technology instead of being managed for corporate benefit, and has much information administered as technology instead of being managed to provide information solutions for business and management results. There are no unifying business entities to be referenced to control all information in, entering, or leaving the enterprise, including emails, Internet downloads, and file transmissions.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) manages the business as one integrated information system

Result-performance Management (R-pM) uses IT to manage the actual business as one simplified Result-performance Management System. R-pM manages other simplified application programs as performance solutions integrated with the business process, where needed, to produce a specific result.

R-pM eliminates overlaid 20^th century business information systems and the need for a large IT overhead. Information technology capital, support, and capabilities are no longer managed separately as “Information Technology”, but are integrated as part of normal capital management. R-pM references all information to the actual business and integrates all information as capital in one Business Information Base to produce data, knowledge, record, and intelligence solutions needed to produce specific business results.

R-pM enables simplified information systems, integrated capital management, and integrated information capital solutions

Result-performance Management eliminates the Corporate IT Empire and the complex information systems laid over the business by organizing and managing the actual business with one simplified system, by simplifying applications to produce specific results, and by properly managing information technology and capital as capital.

IT capital is organized with similar business, facility, and management capital to be managed by professionals. IT systems needed by the business are integrated with the business process to produce specific results. One set of complete, consistent, and accurate management information is reported against the actual current and strategic business, including measured performance costs, result value and value-added, capital worth, and return on capital investments that cannot be measured today.

IT systems and overheads not needed for the business are eliminated. New IT investments are restricted to Result-performance Management Systems to manage actual business results. IT expenditures and investments are reduced dramatically to only those needed to support and manage the actual business.

Learn more in the article “IT Empires and Systems that do not manage the actual Business“, which explains the problems with 20^th century information systems and the administration of high-worth enterprise capital as “information technology”. .

Structures laid over the business produce enormous information complexity

20^th century management does not manage the actual business, but manages the enterprise using a multitude of organization, process, account, performance, system, administration, etc structures laid over the business. The structures are rigid and do not change with actual business change. No structure captures consistent, complete, and accurate business data. The various structures use different names for the same entity and different definitions for the same part of the enterprise. Information systems computerize the various structures producing enormous amounts of incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate information. This causes the exploding information complexity and information management problems enterprises are experiencing today.

Information generally is not organized and managed as capital

Information capital management is not well organized. Accounting is responsible for financial records, information technology may perform data management and record retention, there may be a function for knowledge management, record management, or business or management intelligence. Even with this, there is little management of information for application to improve the business. There is no structure to relate information directly to the business and no data is collected on the actual business as a related set.

The explosion in enterprise information problems and investments demands a basic rethink

These problems are aggravated by the proliferation of IT use for email, Internet information storage and downloads, information exchanges, imaged documents, etc. New corporate governance requirements demand a solution to these problems. [more...]s.

20^th century management cannot capture and report essential business management information

20^th century management lays separate structures over the business for management organization, planning, direction, control, and reporting, such as:

• Organization charts, reporting relationships, and job descriptions for organization
• Strategy, corporate plan, investment, and budget structures for planning
• Work flow, function, project, process, and system structures for direction
• Financial and statistical accounting, activity and project costing, and quality structures for control
• Financial statements, performance management, and strategic enterprise management structures for reporting

Each structure defines inconsistent and conflicting entities like business unit, department, center, function, activity, project, responsibility, etc. The overlaid structures can produce enormous amounts of information producing business and information complexity. But 20^th century management cannot capture and report essential business management information.

20^th century management does not define the entities that contain cost, value, worth, and return

In order to capture data and report information about an entity, the entity must be defined and recorded. 20^th century management attempts to report cost, value, worth, and return without defining the entities that contain cost, value, worth, and return.

Costs are attributed to some known tangible assets and collected against contrived entities like activity, project, and accounts that were not produced by the costs. Numbers for value are produced by certain contrived methods and formulas to lay value chains over the business, without defining and managing the entity that contains value. Worth is defined by arbitrary depreciation formulas for fixed assets, but ignored for human and other capital. Much high-worth capital is labeled as “intangible assets” and not accounted for or managed. Capital development does not identify the precise capital items that are being acquired and developed or the planned utilization of the capital in the business to provide return on investments. [more...].

All business decisions boil down to “what result must be produced as output by the business, what human capital should be responsible, and what other capital should be utilized to produce the result?” Strategic decisions involve the strategic results needed in the future and the capital investments to acquire or develop the capital as performance solutions to produce the strategic results. Management goals involve results to be produced within a certain time. Performance expectations involve the level of performance expected from the human and other capital utilized as specific performance solutions.

Business decisions can be managed only by separately managing results to be produced and the performance solutions to be utilized.

20^th century management does not support business decisions

20^th century management does not define the results to be produced by the business or the performance solutions utilized in business activity as specific managed items, to support business decision-making. Both results accomplished and actions executed have been defined as performance, dating from the 15^th century.

Management decisions are often stated in terms of performance as tasks, activities, jobs, work assignments, etc instead of output results to be produced by when. If management makes a decision to produce a result by whom and by when, the decision can not be implemented and managed as part of the business.

Decisions must be implemented and managed through separate structures laid over the business. The organization structure is updated to say who should carryout the decision. [more...]

20^th century management reports against structures laid over the business

The generally-accepted definition of enterprise business is “the activity of providing goods and services”. In order to organize and manage the business, we must organize and manage both the activity or performance involved in providing and also the goods and services provided to our customers.

20^th century management does not provide a structure to do this. Instead of organizing the business, an organization structure is laid over the business to define organization units, functions, and positions. Since the business is not organized, management structures must be laid over the business. A business strategy defines visions, objectives, owners, requirements, and other entities. The chart of accounts defines centers, objects, and codes. The business process defines process objectives, stations, performance activities, performance quality, and other entities. Information systems have their own built in file structures and entities. Cost accounting gathers known costs against activities, centers, selected final products, or other entity. Performance management systems require reporting on other sets of entities concerning the process, training, customer actions, etc. The many structures laid over the business produce business complexity and hide the actual business.

Overlaid structures capture vast amounts of data and report mountains of information, but not on the actual business

None of these structures captures actual business data or reports actual business information. [more...].

The Result-performance Management Group at ma.gnolia.com contains bookmarks and a short synopsis of articles on R-pM posted at Business Change Forum, the 21st Century Management Magazine, and other internet sites. Browse the articles to read and print those of interest to assist you to get the most from your business change and improvements.

New R-pM articles will be appearing in on-line and print media and will be bookmarked in the Result-performance Management Group, so bookmark the group yourself for easy access to the latest on R-pM.