Archive for the 'Change Management' topic

20^th century enterprise management problems are caused by rigid structures laid over the business

The generally accepted “business enterprise” definition is the activity of providing goods and services. The failure of 20^th century management to organize and manage the business enterprise in the activity of providing goods and services creates unsolvable management, business, and performance problems.

The fatal error of 20^th century management, employed by all companies, corporations, and other enterprises today, is laying a rigid enterprise organization structure over the business, rather than organizing the business. Since the business is not organized, the business cannot be managed. Therefore, rigid enterprise management structures for planning, processes, systems, financial and cost accounts, quality, administration, performance, reporting, etc must be contrived and laid over the business. Structures laid over the business conflict with the actual business, restrict business flexibility, move out of “alignment” as the business changes, prevent direct business data capture and management, and do not provide the direct management information needed to manage the business.

20^th century enterprise management improvements can never solve unsolvable problems

We continue to teach 20^th century enterprise management, contrive new 20^th century structures and “business solutions” to lay over the business, and write more 20^th century management books, but we have never solved the top ten problems of 20^th century enterprise management.

1. Reorganization: The business changes while the organization structure remains rigid, causing upheavals to lay a new rigid organization structure over the business and repeat the cycle
2. Accounting and Financial Management: Historic legacies focus on cash control and prevent professional records management and modern capital management of the actual business increasing financial risk and preventing accurate business management information
3. Investment Analysis and Development Project Management: Investments and projects are managed separate from the business, rather than itemizing, planning, and managing the costs, benefits, and return of capital development investments, as part of the business
4. Administration: Performing functions, while leaving tangible and intangible capital utilization and improvement unmanaged
5. Performance Management: “Performance” definitions mix actions executed with the result accomplished, so business processes, performance management, and KPIs mix results and performance and manage “performance quality”
6. Business Complexity: Each organization, plan, processes, system, administration, or other structure is defined separately with different definitions creating business and information complexity and preventing business collaboration and common solutions applicable to any business
7. Information Technology: Business systems, data, information solutions, networks, and architectures are designed to process overlaid structures and managed as technology, not capital, creating costly IT infrastructures and continuing capital management problems
8. Change Management: Change management addresses the conflicts between structures laid over the business and the actual business to change structures, while the business remains undefined and unmanaged
9. Corporate Governance: Problems are addressed from the governance side to restrict and control management, rather than organizing the business to be governed by management on the corporate side
10. Alignment: Rigid overlaid structures go out of alignment as the business changes requiring continual changes to the structures to align closer to the business

These and other unsolvable 20^th century enterprise management problems are discussed, in detail, here at the Business Change Forum.

Solutions to he top 10 management, business, and performance problems of 20^th century enterprise management are described in a referenced article.

The top 10 problems are eliminated by 21^st century business management

20^th century enterprise management problems are unsolvable, because they can never be solved by laying new or improved structures over the business. [more...].

Reorganization is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century enterprise management

The enterprise organization structure is the fatal error of 20^th century enterprise management

Why do we have to reorganize every few years? Why not organize just once and reorganize gradually as the business changes?

There are many 20^th century business organization theories and methods. Hundreds of books have been written on how to organize the enterprise, organization development, and organization change. There are many so-called business organization methods and structures, but these structures organize the enterprise and are laid over the business. The structures do not organize the actual business, causing the unsolvable reorganization problem. If the business is not organized the business cannot be managed. Additional management structures must be laid over the business to manage the enterprise. This is why the enterprise organization structure is the fatal error of 20^th century enterprise management.

Organizes the business for one business organization structure used for all business management

The business enterprise is defined commonly as “the activity of providing goods and services“. [more...]

Capital Development Project Management is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century enterprise management

20^th century enterprise management cannot plan, manage, or repay capital development projects

Capital development projects for internal management or business improvement today tend to be ad-hoc and conducted separate from the business. We have unsolvable problems in 20^th century capital development project planning, management, and return on the project investment, so we cannot:

• Plan and manage operations and development as an integrated continuum that is part of the business
• Itemize, plan, and achieve specific benefits from development projects
• Clearly and systemically understand what we must be implementing from projects as part of the business for ongoing management and return on investment
• Scope the project as part of the enterprise business to define specific results to add or improve and specific capital solutions to acquire, develop, or improve
• Plan the output results to be produced from the project in specific capital items to be implemented and utilized by the business
• Utilize users and administrative staff in proper roles in the project
• Utilize contractors and consultants as solutions in an enterprise-managed project
• Document and record the project so that all capital developed is fully documented and that knowledge required for use is created
• Manage the capital to be consumed and utilized in the project
• Manage the capital development project as a subsidiary business
• Record accurate development costs by capital item developed
• Implement project results as capital items for direct utilization by the business
• Measure the actual return of capital development investments overall and by capital solution utilized

The unsolvable 20^th century enterprise management problems hamper project management, particularly for enterprise internal capital development and management improvement.

Manage results to drive capital development and gain the return in result value created

Business management provides new breakthroughs for planning and managing enterprise capital development and planning and managing the capital development project.

Capital development develops two things:

• The capital to be utilized as solutions that incur costs
• The results to be produced by the developed capital to provide benefit and return

When we plan and manage a capital development project, we must plan and manage two things:

• The results to be produced by project performance
• The capital to be consumed and performance solutions to be utilized to perform the project

Business management utilizes Result-performance-Management knowledge and procedures to do both. [more...]

Business Complexity is one of the top ten problems of 20^th century enterprise management!

Business complexity is the opposite of business simplicity. The business is simplified by organizing and managing the business.

Business complexity is caused by structures laid over the business and different information in each structure

Instead of organizing and managing the actual business, today’s enterprises lay organization, planning, directing, control, and reporting structures over the business. These rigid structures conflict with each other and the actual changing business creating the business complexity problem. Each structure defines the enterprise differently using inconsistently-defined entities and various information systems, producing the information complexity problem. Different structures used by different enterprises prevent business collaboration and integration.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the knowledge to organize and manage one business structure

Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the concepts and procedures for 21^st century business management to organize one business structure for all planning, directing, control, and reporting. Existing capital is organized as part of the business and overlaid structures are left behind. The business structure produces one set of complete, accurate, and consistently-defined business management information, including actual business information on result value, capital worth, performance costs, and result investment returns that are unknown today.< [more...]

Change Management is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Business change cannot be managed directly because the business is not managed

Business change is a mystery to the 20^th century enterprise because the business, the activity of providing goods and services, is not organized and managed. The enterprise is organized and managed through organization and management structures laid over the business. 20^th century “business change” is not change to the business, but is change to structures laid over the business. Most “business change” lays new organization, process, or system structures over the business with little positive change to the business itself. The rigid new and old structures are separately defined and conflict with each other and the actual changing business. Since the business is not managed, the value created by change cannot be planned or managed and the return on change investments cannot be measured.

The solution is to organize the business for direct management of business change

Business change is a change to either an output result produced by the business or a capital solution utilized in business performance. When the business is organized and managed, business change automatically reorganizes the business and can be managed as the routine. Business management organizes results and capital solutions to change the business as the daily routine. Business change projects involve capital development to increase the value of results or to enable new results, by implementing new or improved capital solutions. If the enterprise does not manage results and capital solutions utilized in performance, it is difficult to manage change to results, capital solutions, and performance.

The Change Management Problem

20^th century business change is change to overlaid organization and management structures

Even accepting 20^th century management change to overlaid organization, process, information system, account, performance management, and other structures, there are another set of problems. [more...]

All capital development should develop capital, plus business results for return on investment

Every business enterprise must produce output results that lead to goods and service results to create value. An expanding enterprise must produce new results of increasing value. The enterprise needs additional capital in order to produce new results as part of the business. The capital must be acquired or developed, implemented as specific capital solutions, and then utilized to produce improved or new results of increased value. The value added to new business results must justify the capital expenditure to acquire or develop needed solutions and provide the return on investment.

All capital development is really result and capital development to develop capital as solutions to be utilized to create additional value in output results produced by the business. The additional value of output results provides the return on the capital development investment. If the capital solutions utilized and the results produced by business performance are not managed, result and capital development cannot be managed properly and the return on investment cannot be measured. Even physical capital development, like a new building, produces capital solutions to produce results, be it the enterprise office facility solution or a facility solution to produce lease or rental income results.

20^th century enterprise management does not organize or manage results or capital as sets

20^th century management used today does not manage the enterprise business, defined as “investments in capital as solutions of worth utilized for costs and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results”. [more...].

Management consultants and their clients are unable to work together to improve actual business management

Many capital development, business change, and management improvement projects involve management consultants. Since the business is not defined, organized, or managed, management consultants cannot work with client enterprises to improve the actual business. Each management consulting firm has their own approaches and methodologies that are not related to the business and are not familiar to the enterprise client. Misunderstandings often arise over the scope of the project and the responsibilities of the consultant and the enterprise.

Management Consulting today faces many unsolvable problems that prevent scoped and measured business change

20^th century management improvement consulting projects have many fundamental and unsolvable problems, such as:

• The enterprise business is not organized, so there is no framework to scope and plan change projects and services
• The business results to improve are not known or managed for added-value
• The capital solutions to acquire, develop, and utilize are not known and managed
• Performance in the utilization of capital solutions to produce results is not defined or managed
• The specific changes needed for success can not be identified and managed
• Consultant services do not change the business, but change structures laid over the business
• The enterprise must learn new organization, plan, process, system, or performance structures with added terminology and definitions
• Changed structures are implemented to adds costs, but not to create value
• The value-added by consulting services is not measured to know success
• The enterprise lacks the capability to manage the investment in development and change
  
• The enterprise does not lead and participate properly to best take over changes
  
• Human and other capital is not managed for utilization allowing change problems
  

These are some common problems with organization and management structures and management consulting approaches utilized today for capital development, business change, and management improvements. Today, the enterprise client and consultant must work in good faith in an unmanaged business environment to produce ad-hoc changes that may or may not improve business results. Business organization and management consulting services tend to be led by the consultant and the client enterprise awaits a deliverable and then decides whether the deliverable is acceptable.

Enterprise clients and management consultants need to work together in partnership to improve the actual business

The enterprise and consultant need a way to define the development and improvements that will provide clear and measurable benefits to the enterprise. The only way is to base business management improvements and management consulting services on the actual business. A new management consulting model is needed that:

• Provides services to help the enterprise organize, manage, improve and develop the business for measured value-added benefit
• Provides a method for enterprises to lead and participate properly in business change
  
• Provides a clear framework to understand scope and means of participation for both parties
• Provides a way to plan and measure the value added by business change to know the return on specific capital investments
• Provides a method to plan, acquire, develop, improve, and utilize specific capital solutions required
• Provides the organization and approach that eliminates the fundamental problems in current business change
  
• Provides a methods and tools that both the enterprise and consultant understand and use
• Provides a means to plan and measure the value the consultant provides and the value-added success the enterprise achieves.< [more...].

20^th century enterprise management cannot capture and report essential business management information

20^th century enterprise management lays separate structures over the business for management organization, planning, direction, control, and reporting, such as:

• Organization charts, reporting relationships, and job descriptions for organization
• Strategy, corporate plan, investment, and budget structures for planning
• Work flow, function, project, process, and system structures for direction
• Financial and statistical accounting, activity and project costing, and quality structures for control
• Financial statements, performance management, and strategic enterprise management structures for reporting

Each structure defines inconsistent and conflicting entities like business unit, department, center, function, activity, project, responsibility, etc. The overlaid structures can produce enormous amounts of information producing business and information complexity. But 20^th century management cannot capture essential business data and report actual financial and non-financial business management information.

20^th century enterprise management does not define the entities that contain cost, value, worth, and return

In order to capture data and report information about an entity, the entity must be defined and recorded. 20^th century management attempts to report cost, value, worth, and return without defining the entities that contain cost, value, worth, and return.

Costs are attributed to some known tangible assets and collected against contrived entities like activity, project, and accounts that were not produced by the costs. Numbers for value are produced by certain contrived methods and formulas to lay value chains over the business, without defining and managing the entity that contains value. Worth is defined by arbitrary depreciation formulas for fixed assets, but ignored for human and other capital. Much high-worth capital is labeled as “intangible assets” and not accounted for or managed. Capital worth is usually mislabeled as “asset value” today. [more...].

The economic crisis produced large investor losses

Several trillion dollars of investor funds were lost in the past six months. Investors, advisers, and experts point out many mistakes made, poor government oversight, the credit freeze, unknown asset value, investor greed, poor corporate governance, and other symptoms as the cause of investor losses. These mistakes are contributors, but not the cause of investor losses. Investment banks, investment funds, stock brokers, investment advisers, government regulators have demonstrated their lack of knowledge of what is really happening and the real cause of the financial and economic crisis and investor losses. They have demonstrated their inability to manage the problem or to identify real solutions. Blind investment professionals are leading blind investors.

Investors must look deep to understand the cause of loss to avoid future loss

Everyone looks for quick fixes and easy solutions every time there is a crisis, so the real fundamental problems continue unsolved. The fundamental problems require deep analysis and understanding of the actual business. Investors must understand the real reason for their losses. There is only on fundamental reason: the failure of financial institutions and other corporations to manage the business to plan the capital investments they must make to create value, manage the proper utilization of their investments to create value, and manage the results produced from their investments that provide value to investors.  Financial institutions and other corporations are not able to do this systematically. They cannot manage capital worth (often called asset value) in the future result cost absorption and result value-added from the utilization of investments and the result value-added to be available from the sale or disposal of the capital solution asset. They are unable to provide information on the transparent actual business for proper government supervision and informed investor decisions. Accounting accounts for cash in a contrived chart of accounts that is not related to the actual business. Arbitrary accounting principles, such as “mark to market” are employed instead of accounting for the business. Financial and risk models used are arbitrary and are not related to the business. Financial statements produced are inaccurate and limited and do not report the business to reveal problems.

Corporations lay structures over their business and manage the enterprise

All financial institutions and other corporations today employ dead-end 20^th century management. [more...].

Many of us have participated in business change projects. Likely, we share many experiences with the difficulties in gaining successful business change. We have read about many cases of problems and disasters.

Something must be wrong. Why after all this experience and the many stories of unsuccessful business change, do we continue to have problems? Have management consultants with their business change and system implementation methodologies provided the answer? Are the conventional methods we use adequate for business change management?

The real problems are fundamental in the way we organize the business. Conventional methods introduce unsolvable problems, so that no business change method or consultant methodology can work properly.

“Business change” is not change to the business, but change to structures laid over the business

The problems start with the fatal error of 20^th century management; the organization structure. [more...]