Archive for the 'Conventional Management Methods' topic

Separate organization and management structures have always been laid over the business causing complexity

Since the beginning, enterprises have implemented organization, process, account, performance, project, IT architectures, administrative functions, and other structures. Each of these many structures must be maintained and managed producing business complexity. Many conflicting entities that define each structure produce information complexity, prevent consistent and accurate management information, and require high-cost information technology overheads. Each structure is fixed and rigid and conflicts with the ever-changing business. Periodically, reorganization and change management is required to bring the fixed structures into closer alignment with the business.

Experts have wanted to find one structure to organize and manage the enterprise as one consistent whole

Over the years, there have been many efforts to create one simple and consistently-defined structure for complete and consistent business data capture, reliable communications, accurate management information, use of common solutions, business collaboration, and other needs. The answer, so far, is to lay higher-level management structures over existing structures to reconcile data from various unrelated structures and to consolidate information. However, until now, no one has defined the one integrated structure that can replace all existing structures and be used to organize and manage any enterprise in any industry.

The one integrated structure has existed all along; it is the business

There is one structure. It has been there all along! That structure is the business itself! [more...]f!

Why do we have such a problem relating knowledge to our business needs?

Enterprises have a well-known problem in relating knowledge to business needs.This is because enterprises do not organize and manage the business. Dead-end 20^th century management used today lays organization, business process, administration, and a variety of other structures over the business to manage the enterprise. Knowledge is not related to the business; knowledge is related to contrived structures laid over the business, such as an index of subjects and topics.

The business is “investments in capital as solutions of worth utilized for costs and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results”. Knowledge is capital consisting of specific solutions of worth utilized to improve the utilization of other solutions for cost and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results. Knowledge is human capital that increases human personnel capital worth by improving their performance in utilizing various capital solutions effectively and producing higher value-quality results. Knowledge is used to develop specific human capability solutions that are utilized to produce specific difficult results to be of high value-quality,

Enterprises need a systematic way to identify specific business results that must be supported by knowledge, identify specific capital solutions that must be utilized properly to produce the result, define the precise knowledge needed, to relate knowledge to the capability of the user applying the knowledge, to link knowledge to where and by whom it is needed, to understand the value created by knowledge that gives worth to the knowledge, and to get feedback and improvement on the knowledge. This can only be done by managing the actual business.

There are many problems inherent in knowledge management today

Many enterprises make large investments in knowledge, but 20^th century methods that we use to manage knowledge limit the value created and the return of the investment:

• Knowledge is labeled as intellectual capital or intangible assets to relieve us of the responsibility to manage knowledge as an asset of worth
• Knowledge is organized by topics or subject matter, which depend on someone referencing the topic to their job or function to put knowledge to use
• Knowledge is human capital to improve human capability, but it is rarely managed as human capital
• Knowledge is delivered through learning, but learning material is often separate from knowledge
• Knowledge is information capital to contribute to the overall business information base, but is usually separated from other information
• Knowledge is not integrated with the business to be utilized as a capital solution to produce value for the enterprise
• Knowledge gains worth by creating value in business results, but results are not managed and only a few results are supported directly by knowledge

Conventional methods hamper the application of knowledge by using structures that are defined through various contrived entities like department, activity, and object, while organizing knowledge by topic, subject, etc. These fundamental problems prevent knowledge from being leveraged to be high-worth capital utilized in a managed business.

Knowledge is human capital that enables other human capital to utilize specific capital solutions to produce specific results

Knowledge is human capital that must be created and managed specifically to increase human capital worth through the value of results produced. Knowledge is also information capital that must be integrated with business data and delivered where needed to produce specific results and to support human capabilities utilized. [more...].

Most managers think that they manage their business

Do you manage your business? What is the definition of the business that you manage? Ask a manager if he manages his business, and the normal response is yes. Ask for the definition of the business they manage, and they do not have a precise definition. Most will describe the enterprise rather than the actual business.

No company, corporation, institution, or other enterprise manager manages the actual business today. The managers employ 20^th century enterprise management to administer the enterprise. It is impossible to manage the business today, because the business has never been defined or organized properly.

The business to manage has never been defined and actual business management has never been taught

What is the enterprise business? There are many conflicting and imprecise definitions for the word “business”. Proper definition of the business is hampered by the definition of performance to include both the utilization of capital in actions executed and the results accomplished. Business schools and management books teach 20^th century management to administer structures laid over the business, and do not define the actual business or teach us how to manage the actual business.

Outside of our explanations of business management, there is no source of information on the real-life fundamentals of actual business organization and management. Since there has never been a precise definition of the business or teachings or books on actual business management, managers do not know what to organize in order to manage the business.

Business management provides a precise definition of the business

So today, results, capital solutions, and performance in the utilization of capital to produce results continue to be confused by the definition of performance. We must separate results and capital utilized from performance in order to define and manage the business. [more...].

20^th century enterprise management problems are caused by rigid structures laid over the business

The generally accepted “business enterprise” definition is the activity of providing goods and services. The failure of 20^th century management to organize and manage the business enterprise in the activity of providing goods and services creates unsolvable management, business, and performance problems.

The fatal error of 20^th century management, employed by all companies, corporations, and other enterprises today, is laying a rigid enterprise organization structure over the business, rather than organizing the business. Since the business is not organized, the business cannot be managed. Therefore, rigid enterprise management structures for planning, processes, systems, financial and cost accounts, quality, administration, performance, reporting, etc must be contrived and laid over the business. Structures laid over the business conflict with the actual business, restrict business flexibility, move out of “alignment” as the business changes, prevent direct business data capture and management, and do not provide the direct management information needed to manage the business.

20^th century enterprise management improvements can never solve unsolvable problems

We continue to teach 20^th century enterprise management, contrive new 20^th century structures and “business solutions” to lay over the business, and write more 20^th century management books, but we have never solved the top ten problems of 20^th century enterprise management.

1. Reorganization: The business changes while the organization structure remains rigid, causing upheavals to lay a new rigid organization structure over the business and repeat the cycle
2. Accounting and Financial Management: Historic legacies focus on cash control and prevent professional records management and modern capital management of the actual business increasing financial risk and preventing accurate business management information
3. Investment Analysis and Development Project Management: Investments and projects are managed separate from the business, rather than itemizing, planning, and managing the costs, benefits, and return of capital development investments, as part of the business
4. Administration: Performing functions, while leaving tangible and intangible capital utilization and improvement unmanaged
5. Performance Management: “Performance” definitions mix actions executed with the result accomplished, so business processes, performance management, and KPIs mix results and performance and manage “performance quality”
6. Business Complexity: Each organization, plan, processes, system, administration, or other structure is defined separately with different definitions creating business and information complexity and preventing business collaboration and common solutions applicable to any business
7. Information Technology: Business systems, data, information solutions, networks, and architectures are designed to process overlaid structures and managed as technology, not capital, creating costly IT infrastructures and continuing capital management problems
8. Change Management: Change management addresses the conflicts between structures laid over the business and the actual business to change structures, while the business remains undefined and unmanaged
9. Corporate Governance: Problems are addressed from the governance side to restrict and control management, rather than organizing the business to be governed by management on the corporate side
10. Alignment: Rigid overlaid structures go out of alignment as the business changes requiring continual changes to the structures to align closer to the business

These and other unsolvable 20^th century enterprise management problems are discussed, in detail, here at the Business Change Forum.

Solutions to he top 10 management, business, and performance problems of 20^th century enterprise management are described in a referenced article.

The top 10 problems are eliminated by 21^st century business management

20^th century enterprise management problems are unsolvable, because they can never be solved by laying new or improved structures over the business. [more...].

Reorganization is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century enterprise management

The enterprise organization structure is the fatal error of 20^th century enterprise management

Why do we have to reorganize every few years? Why not organize just once and reorganize gradually as the business changes?

There are many 20^th century business organization theories and methods. Hundreds of books have been written on how to organize the enterprise, organization development, and organization change. There are many so-called business organization methods and structures, but these structures organize the enterprise and are laid over the business. The structures do not organize the actual business, causing the unsolvable reorganization problem. If the business is not organized the business cannot be managed. Additional management structures must be laid over the business to manage the enterprise. This is why the enterprise organization structure is the fatal error of 20^th century enterprise management.

Organizes the business for one business organization structure used for all business management

The business enterprise is defined commonly as “the activity of providing goods and services“. [more...]

20^th century enterprise management used today does not organize the business

20^th century enterprise management lays a contrived enterprise organization structure over the business, instead of organizing the business. This is the fatal error of 20^th century management. If the business is not organized, the business cannot be managed.

The contrived organization structure follows one of many 20^th century organization theories to organize the enterprise. The business, which we have defined as “investments in capital as solutions of worth utilized for cost and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results” is not organized. The rigid organization structure goes out of “alignment” with every new or closed result or change to a capital solution utilized. Eventually there is need for reorganization to contrive a new organization structure that is closer aligned to the actual business, and the cycle is repeated.

The need for reorganization shows that the business is not organized

Some may argue that their business is organized. Ask if they ever reorganize the business, and they will answer yes, of course. Reorganization is needed because the business is not organized. [more...].

Accounting is part of one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century enterprise management

A chart of accounts is laid over the business, rather than recording the actual business

20^th century management historically has separated cash from other capital to be managed in financial management and to be accrued and recorded through accounting. The need for the separation has decreased due to technology and advanced solutions. Technology has also led to high-worth information and intellectual capital that needs to be accounted for and managed. But the separate focus on cash tends to prevent other capital of worth from being managed professionally. Capital and cash transactions that are recorded are recorded against a contrived chart of accounts, rather than accurately recording the complete financial status of the actual business.

Establish facility records capital to professionally record the actual business

The business organizes all capital, including currently undefined capital and “intangible assets”. The business manages accounts and other records of the business as facility records capital and provides capital solutions from records as information capital. Facility records are the tangible information capital of the enterprise. Facility records go beyond the limitations of accounting to record:

• Financial records for the full business cycle, including fundamental business data on performance costs, result value, and capital worth
• Non-financial records for statistical, documentation, images, and other records

Business management broadens 20^th century accounting to professional records management to keep records on the actual business and to make records solutions available to produce high-value results.

The Accounting Problem

Accounting does not record the actual business

Due to 20^th century management problem number one, the business is not organized. [more...]

Financial Management is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management

Financial Management manages money separate from other tangible assets

The early 20^th century enterprise was concerned about managing and protecting cash. Financial management fundamentals were established to manage actual and accrued cash from the point received until the point that it is invested or spent. Financial management problems such as unknown capital worth, unknown costs, unknown value creation, and unknown return on capital investments have never been solved by traditional financial management. Financial management tends to be equated with capital management. This allows non-financial capital to be administered, rather than managed, or to be labeled as “intangible assets” and not accounted for or managed. Today, financial capital is managed largely by computers. Non-financial capital and intangible assets are an increasing percentage of enterprise worth and must be managed properly.

Financial capital must be managed with other tangible facility capital to create value in results

Financial capital must be managed as part of the business and not administered separate form the business. 21st business management utilizes financial management capabilities to manage all tangible facility assets. Financial assets and facilities are a sub-set of reusable facility equipment capital, cash is a sub-set of consumable facility supply capital, and accounts are sub-set of facility records capital.

All facility capital requires similar application of expertise to operate and maintain, to supply, and to record. In a managed business, all facility capital is supported for operation and development and for utilization to produce value in results.

The business also integrates financial parts of other results that have been separated out. Management strategy capital includes financial strategies as an integral part of management strategy solutions. Investment management results manage shareholder funds for investment, capital development, and shareholder value results.

The Financial Management Problem

20^th century financial management gives us intangible assets, unknown costs, unknown value, and unknown worth

Now, as we go into the 21^st century, there is a growing need to go beyond financial management fundamentals and change the way enterprise capital is managed: [more...]

Investment Analysis is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century enterprise management

20^th century investment analysis cannot plan the actual return on investments

How does your company analyze strategic investments in capital development? Does your company perform a cost-benefit analysis? Are all the specific investments needed for business success planned? Are the costs of the investment analyzed, itemized, and scheduled? Are the benefits of the investment analyzed, itemized, and scheduled? Is the value to be added to the business planned and set up as goals to menage the return on investment?

For the most part, 20^th century investment management cannot itemize the costs or benefits of investment, particularly investments in management improvement and business change. Costs are project expenditures rather than investments in specifically-identified capital items. Benefits are usually estimates of increases in revenues or reductions in costs.

Identify and value results needed to justify investments and set result goals to manage the return on all investments

21^st century business management manages the economic outputs of the business as specific results and manages the invested capital utilized to produce results as specific capital solutions. [more...]

Administration is one of the top ten problems of 20^th century management

20^th century enterprise management includes wasteful and counterproductive administrative functions

20^th century administration performs a function involving fixed routine tasks. Responsibility is for the function or the process of administering, rather than producing results. Administration is responsible for managing enterprise capital, but few administrators recognize this responsibility, in effect preventing proper capital management. Much capital is assigned to centers or labeled as “intangible assets”, removing it from professional management. Other capital is loosely administered through functions, instead of being specifically managed to produce benefit and achieve a return on the enterprise investment. The emphasis is on administrative performance rather than capital result management.

The solution is to replace administration with professional capital management

All enterprises invest large sums in the business to acquire or develop capital solutions. All enterprise capital investments must be organized for professional 21^st century business management for operation, support, development, and utilization to produce results. Administration is replaced with capital management. Capital managers must produce capital management results to develop, maintain, and improve the worth of capital to provide specific solutions. [more...]