Archive for the 'Performance Management' topic

Separate organization and management structures have always been laid over the business causing complexity

Since the beginning, enterprises have implemented organization, process, account, performance, project, IT architectures, administrative functions, and other structures. Each of these many structures must be maintained and managed producing business complexity. Many conflicting entities that define each structure produce information complexity, prevent consistent and accurate management information, and require high-cost information technology overheads. Each structure is fixed and rigid and conflicts with the ever-changing business. Periodically, reorganization and change management is required to bring the fixed structures into closer alignment with the business.

Experts have wanted to find one structure to organize and manage the enterprise as one consistent whole

Over the years, there have been many efforts to create one simple and consistently-defined structure for complete and consistent business data capture, reliable communications, accurate management information, use of common solutions, business collaboration, and other needs. The answer, so far, is to lay higher-level management structures over existing structures to reconcile data from various unrelated structures and to consolidate information. However, until now, no one has defined the one integrated structure that can replace all existing structures and be used to organize and manage any enterprise in any industry.

The one integrated structure has existed all along; it is the business

There is one structure. It has been there all along! That structure is the business itself! [more...]f!

Some enterprises take pride in their business complexity

When you talk to a company manager about employing a standard solution the response is often “Our business is too complex for a standard solution”. This is said with a measure of pride in being associated with a complex business. Is a complex business something to strive for or to be proud of? What is the alternative to a standard solution? Do non-standard solutions simplify the business? What is better, simplify the business to use standard solutions, or continue to develop non-standard solutions that compound existing complexity?

Business complexity is eliminated by organizing only the business essentials

Enterprises today introduce business complexity as soon a they implement an organization structure that is laid over the business. Since the business is not organized, they must lay more structures for strategy, accounts, business processes, performance management, etc over the business in order to manage the enterprise. Each additional structure introduces more entities with conflicting definitions to be managed and increases business and information complexity.

Business complexity is a misnomer. The business is not complex; enterprise management through rigid structures laid over the changing business is complex. The answer is to clear away contrived overlaid structures and organize the business for simplified 21^st century business management. All business organization, planning, direction, control, reporting, and governance employs the current and strategic business structures and only the essential business data entities.

Business complexity is accepted as normal in today’s enterprise

Business complexity is built in to 20^th century enterprise management methods, so business complexity is accepted as normal. We have no straightforward method to identify and root out business complexity and then to prevent future business complexity. [more...].

20^th century enterprise management lays structures over the business to direct the enterprise

The day to day operations of the enterprise today are directed through a variety of structures laid over the business. These structures focus on enterprise performance, which mixes the actions of performance together with the results accomplished. The main structures used to direct the enterprise are:

• Processes, which define the flow of performance across the enterprise
• Functions, which define activities performed by the enterprise
• Information systems, which provide the flow of information processing
• Work assignments and tasks, to perform ad-hoc activities
• Projects, to perform one-time enterprise endeavors

These structures are used to direct performance of the enterprise and to produce results as separate entities, such as products, services, sales, and revenue.

None of the overlaid structures directs the actual business

The actual business consists of results produced, capital available in performance solutions, and performance to utilize solutions to produce each result. None of the overlaid structures direct the utilization of capital solutions to produce results. Most enterprise direction is up to the experience and capability of the manager to make decisions and take actions without a business framework.

Structures used to direct the enterprise do not relate to other management structures

The structures used to direct the enterprise do not relate directly to the structures used to organize, plan, control, and report the enterprise. A prior article showed that certain structures are used to plan the enterprise in strategic maps and corporate plans, financial plans and budgets, information technology plans and architectures, investment and capital development plans, and operational plans. The structures used to direct the enterprise are not connected to or do not necessarily refer to the structures that plan the enterprise. Enterprise direction and management is disconnected among a wide variety of structures that can be contrived and laid over any business, such as business process, administrative function, risk management, performance management, and information system structures.< [more...].

20^th century enterprise management problems are caused by rigid structures laid over the business

The generally accepted “business enterprise” definition is the activity of providing goods and services. The failure of 20^th century management to organize and manage the business enterprise in the activity of providing goods and services creates unsolvable management, business, and performance problems.

The fatal error of 20^th century management, employed by all companies, corporations, and other enterprises today, is laying a rigid enterprise organization structure over the business, rather than organizing the business. Since the business is not organized, the business cannot be managed. Therefore, rigid enterprise management structures for planning, processes, systems, financial and cost accounts, quality, administration, performance, reporting, etc must be contrived and laid over the business. Structures laid over the business conflict with the actual business, restrict business flexibility, move out of “alignment” as the business changes, prevent direct business data capture and management, and do not provide the direct management information needed to manage the business.

20^th century enterprise management improvements can never solve unsolvable problems

We continue to teach 20^th century enterprise management, contrive new 20^th century structures and “business solutions” to lay over the business, and write more 20^th century management books, but we have never solved the top ten problems of 20^th century enterprise management.

1. Reorganization: The business changes while the organization structure remains rigid, causing upheavals to lay a new rigid organization structure over the business and repeat the cycle
2. Accounting and Financial Management: Historic legacies focus on cash control and prevent professional records management and modern capital management of the actual business increasing financial risk and preventing accurate business management information
3. Investment Analysis and Development Project Management: Investments and projects are managed separate from the business, rather than itemizing, planning, and managing the costs, benefits, and return of capital development investments, as part of the business
4. Administration: Performing functions, while leaving tangible and intangible capital utilization and improvement unmanaged
5. Performance Management: “Performance” definitions mix actions executed with the result accomplished, so business processes, performance management, and KPIs mix results and performance and manage “performance quality”
6. Business Complexity: Each organization, plan, processes, system, administration, or other structure is defined separately with different definitions creating business and information complexity and preventing business collaboration and common solutions applicable to any business
7. Information Technology: Business systems, data, information solutions, networks, and architectures are designed to process overlaid structures and managed as technology, not capital, creating costly IT infrastructures and continuing capital management problems
8. Change Management: Change management addresses the conflicts between structures laid over the business and the actual business to change structures, while the business remains undefined and unmanaged
9. Corporate Governance: Problems are addressed from the governance side to restrict and control management, rather than organizing the business to be governed by management on the corporate side
10. Alignment: Rigid overlaid structures go out of alignment as the business changes requiring continual changes to the structures to align closer to the business

These and other unsolvable 20^th century enterprise management problems are discussed, in detail, here at the Business Change Forum.

Solutions to he top 10 management, business, and performance problems of 20^th century enterprise management are described in a referenced article.

The top 10 problems are eliminated by 21^st century business management

20^th century enterprise management problems are unsolvable, because they can never be solved by laying new or improved structures over the business. [more...].

Business performance utilizes capital available to the business to produce business results

Business management defines the business as “investments in capital as solutions of worth utilized for costs and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results”. Every business in the world invests in capital, in order to have the capital needed to produce output results. Every business in the world must produce specific economic output results in order to be successful. Business performance is the actual utilization of capital to produce results.

20^th century business performance includes both actions executed and results accomplished

The 20^th century definition of performance used in business today includes both the actions executed and results accomplished. This definition causes many 20^th century management problems and prevents actual business definition and management. Business performance management, capital development, business processes, management reporting, key performance indicators, etc mix both performance and results produced together as performance. This causes problems today in actually distinguishing and separating results produced from the performance executed. Sales performance includes the both utilization of human salesmanship capability in actions executed and the volume and value of sales accomplished.

21^st century business management separates results from performance to manage the performance producing a result

Actual business performance does not include things accomplished or business results. [more...].

Administration is one of the top ten problems of 20^th century management

20^th century enterprise management includes wasteful and counterproductive administrative functions

20^th century administration performs a function involving fixed routine tasks. Responsibility is for the function or the process of administering, rather than producing results. Administration is responsible for managing enterprise capital, but few administrators recognize this responsibility, in effect preventing proper capital management. Much capital is assigned to centers or labeled as “intangible assets”, removing it from professional management. Other capital is loosely administered through functions, instead of being specifically managed to produce benefit and achieve a return on the enterprise investment. The emphasis is on administrative performance rather than capital result management.

The solution is to replace administration with professional capital management

All enterprises invest large sums in the business to acquire or develop capital solutions. All enterprise capital investments must be organized for professional 21^st century business management for operation, support, development, and utilization to produce results. Administration is replaced with capital management. Capital managers must produce capital management results to develop, maintain, and improve the worth of capital to provide specific solutions. [more...]

Performance Management is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

The definition of performance and performance management is a fundamental 20^th century enterprise management problem

Since the 15^th century, performance has been defined as both the capital utilized in action executed and the results accomplished. The definition prevents management of results separate from performance and restricts enterprise management to one confused performance dimension. Performance management is a big part of 20^th century management, with a variety of structures like processes, dashboards, and scorecards laid over the business. Key performance indicators (KPI) mix result volumes, capital utilized, and performance levels. Business process re-engineering focuses on business process management and performance quality to produce a process output. Many performance and productivity methods and consultants redefine costs out of the process and into other capital utilized in the business.

Separate results and capital from performance to enable 21^st century business management

The performance management problem is eliminated by separating results and capital solutions from performance to organize the enterprise business in results produced, capital solutioins utilized, and the performance of a solution to produce a result. The enterprise business changes each time management decides to produce a new result, close a finished result, or utilize a different capital solution. Capital management acquires, develops, improves, and supports capital solution investments that have the potential and are qualified to produce results. [more...]

Change Management is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Business change cannot be managed directly because the business is not managed

Business change is a mystery to the 20^th century enterprise because the business, the activity of providing goods and services, is not organized and managed. The enterprise is organized and managed through organization and management structures laid over the business. 20^th century “business change” is not change to the business, but is change to structures laid over the business. Most “business change” lays new organization, process, or system structures over the business with little positive change to the business itself. The rigid new and old structures are separately defined and conflict with each other and the actual changing business. Since the business is not managed, the value created by change cannot be planned or managed and the return on change investments cannot be measured.

The solution is to organize the business for direct management of business change

Business change is a change to either an output result produced by the business or a capital solution utilized in business performance. When the business is organized and managed, business change automatically reorganizes the business and can be managed as the routine. Business management organizes results and capital solutions to change the business as the daily routine. Business change projects involve capital development to increase the value of results or to enable new results, by implementing new or improved capital solutions. If the enterprise does not manage results and capital solutions utilized in performance, it is difficult to manage change to results, capital solutions, and performance.

The Change Management Problem

20^th century business change is change to overlaid organization and management structures

Even accepting 20^th century management change to overlaid organization, process, information system, account, performance management, and other structures, there are another set of problems. [more...]

Methods like Total Quality Management, Six Sigma, and ISO 9000 Standards do not provide the quality management needed

We have had structures like Total Quality Management (TQM) and the ISO quality system for ISO 9000 standards and certification, which were found lacking as a management method. We also reengineered our business process with BPR, specifically to help us manage performance quality. But, performance quality proved difficult to comprehend and manage. Six Sigma provides another structure for our final production quality. Now we have business process and performance management (BPM) to manage the quality of our processes and performance. Even with all this, we still have not found a way to manage quality as the business routine of everyone in the enterprise.

Customer-determined quality is managed result by result by managing the businss

Quality must be managed as part of the managed business defined as “investments in capital as solutions of worth utilized for costs and effectiveness of performance to produce value and quality in results”. By definition, in the business, value and quality are attributes of results, the economic outputs produced across a managed business. Result-performance Management (R-pM) provides the knowledge and procedures to organize the business by organizing results produced across the business as one-off results or as result chains and by organizing the capital utilized as solutions in business performance to produce each result. With an organized business, the company can manage quality as an attribute of results, not performance, and can manage real quality for any result, not just final results from production. [more...].

20^th century enterprise management administers human resources

20^th century enterprise management provides the human resource function to administer human resources. Human resources provide administration for recruitment, actions, payroll, and some development functions. While human capital may be called human capital, rarely is there any real effort to develop humans as actual capital solutions to meet the specific business needs and increase individual human worth to the enterprise.

20^th century enterprise management cannot develop and apply human and knowledge capital directly to the business

Some more advanced companies try to develop human capital, but as humans rather than as the specific capital solutions needed by the business. They are at a disadvantage because the business is not organized to define specific business needs, to understand where special capabilities are required in the business, to understand the value created in the business through application of human capabilities, and the added worth of human capabilities through value creation.

Rule No. 8 of 21^st century business management: Manage human personnel, capability, and knowledge capital to increase human worth

21^st century business management organizes the business results produced and human capital as specific solutions to be utilized to produce specific results. Rule No. 8 requires that human capital be identified as specific capital solutions utilized to produce business results, investments be made to develop human capital to increase the value of assigned results, human capital performance be managed against the results produced to increase human worth, and that human reward be a commensurate part of proven human worth to the business. As part of this rule, there are business management principles for strong human capital management:

• Define economic output results that must be produced across the business and those high-value results that require specific human capability solutions
• Analyze the business process to produce difficult high-value results and describe how human capabilities must utilize the process
• Define specific high-worth capabilities to produce high-value results as capital solutions for specific human knowledge and human capability development
• Focus human capital on results, so that they always know the results expected and how to apply their capabilities to produce results
• Develop human capabilities as specific capital solutions to produce specific high-value results
• Support human capital with knowledge capital to utilize specific capital solutions to produce specific results
• Let human capital know the value of their results and how their performance can add value to results
• Let human capital know the relationship between the value added to results produced and their worth to the enterprise as human capital
• Compensate and reward human capital in accordance with their human capital worth

Strategic human capital development develops the capabilities described in the business process and the knowledge required to produce new high-value strategic results. [more...].