Archive for the 'Result Management' topic

Redefining BPM: Why Results and Performance Must Be Separated

The June 2008 issue of BPM Business Performance Management Magazine carries a lead article explaining the business organization and management breakthrough with Result-performance Management (R-pM). The article, “Redefining BPM: Why Results and Performance must Be Separated”, explains the superiority of R-pM over 20^th century management methods like BPM, be it business performance management or business process management. The article explains problems with 20^th century management and why R-pM as the only way to organize the business for 21^st Century Management to eliminate 20^th century management structures laid over the business.

20^th century definition of performance prevents business organization and management

One of the main problems of 20^th century management methods like business performance management (BPM) is the definition of performance to include both the utilization of capital in actions executed and results accomplished. Performance management methods and Key Performance Indicators (KPI) mix together capital utilized, performance at an ongoing level, and results produced as economic outputs in a time period. Business Performance Management (BPM) does not identify or manage results, capital, and performance as entities and sets of items to be managed. This prevents the business, which the article defines as “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs and produce value in results” from being managed.

Results and performance must be separated to organize and manage the business

Result-performance Management manages results separate from capital, and the utilization of capital in performance. [more...].

Business performance utilizes capital available to the business to produce business results

Result-performance Management (R-pM) defines the business as “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs and produce value in results”. Every business in the world must produce specific economic output results in order to be successful. Every business in the world invests in capital, in order to have the capital needed to produce output results. Business performance is the actual utilization of capital to produce results.

20^th century business performance includes both actions executed and results accomplished

The 20^th century definition of performance used in business today includes both the actions executed and results accomplished. This definition causes many 20^th century management problems and prevents actual business definition and management. Business performance management, capital development, business processes, management reporting, key performance indicators, etc mix both performance and results produced together as performance. This causes problems today in actually distinguishing and separating results produced from the performance executed.

R-pM separates results from performance to manage the performance producing a result

Actual business performance does not include things accomplished or business results. R-pM separates out results as results produced by business performance and restricts business performance to the activity of the business and actions executed by the business. [more...].

20^th century management used today cannot manage business risk as part of the business because the business is not organized or managed. 20^th century risk management is separate from the business and concentrates on areas of proven risk, but does not cover the normal risk that is present and should be managed in everything the enterprise does.

Risk is inherent in every business and must be managed as part of the business. But, risk can be managed as part of the business only by using Result-performance Management (R-pM) to organize and manage the actual business.

Risk tends to be managed by a risk management process

Most enterprises say they manage risk. Many have risk management functions or processes to prove it. Risk is managed by risk management structures laid over the business.

There are specialists and companies devoted to risk management. Many books have been written on risk management. But, do they point us in the right direction or tell us what we really should be doing to manage day-to-day risks we face in our businesses?

Risk is an inherent part of the business

We all face the risk that things we want done or to happen will not be done or happen as wanted. [more...]

Methods like Total Quality Management and ISO 9000 Standards did not provide the quality management needed

We have had structures like Total Quality Management (TQM) and the ISO quality system for ISO 9000 standards and certification, which were found lacking as a management method. We also reengineered our business process with BPR, specifically to help us manage performance quality. But, performance quality proved difficult to comprehend and manage. Six Sigma provides another structure for our final production quality. Now we have business process and performance management (BPM) to manage the quality of our processes and performance. Even with all this, we still have not found a way to manage quality as the business routine of everyone in the enterprise.

R-pM manages customer determined quality result by result

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business by organizing results produced across the business as one-off results or as result chains and by organizing the capital utilized as performance solutions to produce each result. With an organized business, the company can manage quality as an attribute of results, not performance, and can manage real quality for any result, not just final results from production. Every result has a customer who is willing to pay a result value for a determined level of quality. Quality and value of each result must be acceptable to the customer. [more...].

Most managers think that they manage their business and make business decisions

Do you manage your business? What is the definition of the business that you manage? Ask a manager if he manages his business and makes business decisions, the normal response is yes. Ask for the definition of the business, and they cannot give a precise definition. Most will describe the enterprise rather than the actual business.

No corporation, institution, or other enterprise manager manages the actual business today. The managers employ 20^th century management to administer the enterprise. Managers make enterprise decisions to manage and change the enterprise, rather than business decisions to manage and change the business. It is impossible to manage the business today, because the business has never been defined properly or organized.

The business to manage has never been defined and actual business management has never been taught

What is the enterprise business? There are many conflicting and imprecise definitions for the word “business”. Proper definition of the business is hampered by the definition of performance to include both the utilization of capital in actions executed and the results accomplished. Business schools and management books teach dead-end 20^th century management to administer structures laid over the business, and do not define the actual business or teach us to manage the actual business.

Outside of R-pM, there is no source of information on the real-life fundamentals of actual business organization and management. Since there has never been a precise definition of the business or teachings or books on actual business management, managers do not know what to organize in order to manage the business.

R-pM provides a precise definition of the business

We must separate performance from results using Result-performance Management (R-pM) in order to define and manage the business. R-pM defines the business as “the utilization of capital of worth in performance to incur costs and produce value in results”. [more...].

Alignment is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Alignment covers many problems arising from conflicts between the actual business and overlaid structures

We keep hearing about alignment problems. Alignment problems are caused because the business is not organized. Alignment problems arise from actual business change in results produced and capital utilized as performance solutions, which remain undefined and unorganized. Instead, the enterprise is organized, planned, directed, controlled, and reported through separate and distinct structures laid over the business. With every business change, rigid overlaid structures go out of alignment with the business. Many solutions are available supposedly to enable alignment. Many books have proposed alignment solutions. However, in spite of all of these solutions and books, alignment problems remain. The alignment solutions attempt to align organization and management structures with each other with nothing to align against. “Alignments with the business” do not actually define the business to align against.

Result-performance Management solves the alignment problem by organizing and managing the business

The various alignment problems are eliminated by organizing the business. Result-performance Management organizes and manages the business through one integrated result-performance business structure, which aligns all deployed performance solutions with the output results they produce. With R-pM, there is only one business structure and no alignment problem. Structures laid over the business are removed. One business structure is used for all organization, planning, directing, control, and reporting.

The Alignment Problem

The conventional enterprise faces many unsolvable alignment problems

We have such well-known alignment problems, such as the following, because of rigid structures laid over the business: [more...]:

Change Management is one of the top 10 problems of 20^th century management!

Business change cannot be managed directly because the business is not managed

Business change is a mystery to the 20^th century enterprise because the business, the activity of providing goods and services, is not organized and managed. The enterprise is organized and managed through organization and management structures laid over the business. 20^th century “business change” is not change to the business, but is change to structures laid over the business. Most “business change” lays new organization, process, or system structures over the business with little positive change to the business itself. Since the business is not managed, the value created by change cannot be planned or managed and the return on change investments cannot be measured.

Result-performance Management (R-pM) organizes the business for direct management of business change

Business change is a change to either an output result produced by the business or a performance solution utilized by the business. When the business is organized and managed, business change automatically reorganizes the business and can be managed as the routine. R-pM organizes results and performance solutions to change the business as the daily routine. Business change projects involve result-performance development to increase the value of results or to enable new results, by implementing new or improved performance solutions. If the enterprise does not manage results and performance, it is difficult to manage change to results and performance.

The Change Management Problem

20^th century business change is change to overlaid organization and management structures

Even accepting 20^th century management change to overlaid organization, process, information system, account, performance management, and other structures, there are another set of problems. [more...]

Separate organization and management structures have always been laid over the business causing complexity

Since the beginning, enterprises have implemented organization, process, account, performance, project, IT architectures, administrative functions, and other structures. Each of these many structures must be maintained and managed producing business complexity. Many conflicting entities that define each structure produce information complexity, prevent consistent and accurate management information, and require high-cost information technology overheads.

Experts have wanted to find one structure to organize and manage the enterprise as one consistent whole

Over the years, there have been many efforts to create one simple and consistently-defined structure for reliable communications, accurate management information, use of common solutions, business collaboration, and other needs. The answer, so far, is to lay higher level management structures over existing structures and the business to consolidate information and reconcile data from other structures. However, until now, no one has defined the one integrated structure that can replace all existing structures and be used to organize and manage any enterprise in any industry.

The one integrated structure has existed all along; it is the business

There is one structure. It has been there all along! That structure is the business itself! [more...]f!

What does performance really mean?

Performance is one of the most widely used words in describing how the business is organized and managed. Performance is used in business performance management, human performance management, key performance indicators, performance management systems, and methods like control panels and scorecards, and performance evaluations. Therefore, it is very important to have a precise and usable definition of performance.

How do you define performance? What is the definition put forward for your performance management methods or solutions? What does your dictionary say? Does the definition make sense? Are your key performance indicators actually performance indicators? Do your performance management methods actually manage performance? What is performance in our enterprise, and how should we define performance?

Both the activity of performance and the result of the performance are defined as performance

If you look up the definition business enterprise, you will likely find a definition, “the activity of providing goods and services”. If you look up the definition of performance or performance management, you likely will see that “performance” defines not only the activity as performance, but also defines the goods and services and other output results produced by the activity as performance. [more...].

R-pM Community members and R-pM Toolkit users ask questions about identifying and defining business results, such as new product or service developed, products produced, product or service sold, services delivered, capital supported, capital developed, projects completed, etc. Specific questions are answered by email, but we summarize common questions in the series of articles on How to Use R-pM.

Defining business results is new, since results produced by the business have never been identified and managed as a set. First, it is important to designate a capable business analyst to lead business organization capital, so that expertise is developed, and a specialist can guide others. Also, use The R-pM Toolkit, which has layouts, guidelines, and the answers to most questions.

Some businesses simply ask managers to define results they produce. This can provide a first cut, but managers need explanations and guidance. Result teams for the whole business or parts of the business should analyze, brainstorm, and define the results to be produced by the future business, to be explained to and reviewed with management.

Identifying and defining results is difficult at first, but gets easier as understanding and experience is gained. Eventually it becomes the business routine. [more...]